Taken from the BBC this morning:- "The weather system has been given various nicknames - in the UK it is "the Beast from the East" while the Dutch call it the "Siberian bear" and Swedes the "snow cannon". We pay £350m a week to the EU and they still can't harmonise the naming convention for winter weather systems - bloody amateurs.
I believe in their manifesto "costings" this translates into creating a new bank for the country, filling it up with taxpayers cash, then loaning it to the government for spending. He just keeps forgetting to tell people who the bank will get its start up cash from.
yip, and this is the disparity across the uk and the circle the may is failing to square. i guess past events are coming back to bite them on the bum, re 2014 and the lead up to where the EU was promoted as pretty much be all and end all and a yes vote means out. doh.
Gimlet seems stuck in the dark ages. I bet he still wears chain mail and carries a St George flag everywhere. You know, St George, that well known 'English' knight.
now now, emotional times. as a splitter myself i get some arguments better than others. we dont want to be a product of the hate fest the media have whipped up, dont let the usual torys tactic's win. no, i aint had a dooby and yes, my chilled state could change at anytime concentrate yer fire
Its OK The Government has come up with a plan!!!! Mrs May is expected to set out five tests to guide the UK in negotiations: That any deal must respect the referendum result That any deal must not break down That any deal must protect jobs and security That any deal must be "consistent with the kind of country we want to be" - modern, outward-looking and tolerant That any agreement must bring the country together
With everything Chairman Corbyn says, you have to remember that essentially he doesn't believe in private property - at least, not for other people. He's a Trotskyite communists you believes all property is theft. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...-for-complete-rehabilitation-of-leon-trotsky/ In his ideal world there would be no tax on private income to fund spending because there would be no private income. Nor indeed private property or private wealth. Society would become a collective and there would be no public spending as such because all property and equity would be public already. If you have a house, a pension or money in the bank, it is Corbyn and McDonnell's dream to relieve you of it and take all you possess into state ownership. In their dream state there would be no salaries. All income would be the property of the state and citizens would receive an allowance for their labours. That is the economic basis of the Labour leader's hideous totalitarian dream and it explains Corbyn's bizarre attitude to banks and loans. If you consider his pronouncements in the context of a free market, private enterprise and a state that is the servant of the people rather than the other way round, they are preposterous; but set against the Trotskyite parallel universe in which he dwells, what starts out sounding like childlike naivety on his part begins to make terrible sense. It is staggering that any person in their right minds would consider casting a vote for such lunacy, even the young and stupid, but they will and they won't grasp just what they have voted for until it is too late.
seems an extreme view.. during the bad old late sixties and seventies when nationalization and the unions where big, our business along with many many many others serviced the nationalized businesses and housing stock. thats an example of state ownership and private enterprise working together
It is indeed extreme. It isn't of course in the Labour party's manifesto but nevertheless that is the guiding far-left philosophy of Corbyn, McDonnell and Momentum entryists.
It is indeed extreme. It isn't of course in the Labour party's manifesto but nevertheless that is the guiding far-left philosophy of Corbyn, McDonnell and Momentum entryists.
Would you appoint a person to your party as an equalities advisor who has said, all white people are racists and the suffragettes were white supremacists. It seems Jeremy has no issue with it.
He has no problem befriending terrorists so I imagine appointing a racist as an equality adviser seems a logical step to him.
