How would you rate the importance of the actual reasons people voted the way they did, compared to why you think they voted the way they did? Would you prefer to work with your assumptions, actual data (which isn't available) or would you maybe simply not place voters into small, easily manipulated pigeon-holes in order to push your personal agenda? Asking for a friend. Also - what article? (That's mine!)
I think fin neglected the title of the article as it may have given the game away http://www.thenational.scot/news/16887166.leave-voting-towns-will-be-hit-hardest-by-brexit/
i dont doubt that hatred of the other is a rational thing to the racist you asked me what i thought, i told you, writing 1000words explaining your reasoning is no less pigeon holing brw..
1 who does that apply to as eu residents in the U.K. could not vote? 2 Boston and Skegness in the East Midlands had the highest Leave majority, followed by South Basildon and East Thurrock. This is what happens when Scots only is important, do English places, Skegness and Boston are in Lincolnshire on the east coast and NOT in the Midlands 3 I would not say quite a few, I would say very few 4 That needs to be explained better as it is little more than the old where the shot lands is where my target was 5 Vast majority I suspect
aye, and? you noticed the authors of the report where named and their interests declared. no unnamed, some "critics " said, or, names dropped without their "special " interests mentioned.
Not quite fin, the article declared this Research compiled by Heather McCauley, former Scottish Government head of strategy, and Professor Duncan Maclennan of Glasgow University the advisor to the eu and world bank, indi 2 advocates was never shown. I've no problem with them declaring it as it shows the direction of the authors, even if their map direction is shit , I'd prefer the honesty upfront though as it gives a more balanced view
Help me, Obi Fin Kenobi, you're my only hope! Very rarely do you reassure me finm but this is one occasion. Anyone, you were explaining something to me but it seems to involve hyperbole, describing nonsense, in pure gibberish over a total non-issue so let's take it from the top again. The English, under Sauron, were oppressing the Northern Elves and ... you weren't making any sense at all after that ...
yip, you could goggle a name, you did good. and a wee lesson to those that aint as bright as loz. check yer sources.
I've decided that you need English lessons. If you start to show an aptitude for it ("do good") , we can then move on to politics. I haven't given up on you, buddy, I have just reassessed your needs ("you're a fecking moron").
