I think even these idiots have realised that the wording has to be much better than it was previously. Leave on WTO/ leave with a Norway style deal/ Remain. Leave WTO could well win as Norway or Remain will divide the vote.
I disagree, Leave on WTO would have to be an option on the ballot. Actually I'm going to say it will be an option 'cause I do think there will be another ref after May is booted in the New Year.
The Norway option would get nearly 100% of the vote, as the other two factions would be too scared of splitting he vote and allowing the other side to win. Ironically, the Norway option is the worst of the three and no one in their right mind would want it.. I love politics : o D
It is possible there will be a second ref but the establishment won't risk a landslide win for WTO. It won't be on the ballot, trust me.
I’m starting to. Another vote could be a hoot. Though best Choices probably ; 1 Stay in the EU. 2 Don’t leave the EU. That way gov get what they want.
I was being slightly whimsical. The idea that people are so scared of splitting the vote that they vote for a worse option as a result tickled me. A second ref will only feature two options, never three.
The government will want to end this will support and some concensus. A ballot without the three Leave/ Noway deal/ or Remain will not be acceptable.
No three-option ref would be called, and if called, it would never be accepted as legitimate. The establishment knows how stupid voters are and knows for a fact that three choices would fry their little democratic brains.
"She needs a hospital!" "Hospital? OMG, what is it?" "It's a big place, with doctors and nurses but that isn't important right now."
Indeed. Do we leave on terms that are indistinguishable from "Remaining"? Or do we leave on terms that are indistinguishable from not "Leaving"?
Wait - if the people are considered too stupid to choose correctly, they were too stupid last time aswell...