British Indy: What Happens Now?

Discussion in 'Wasteland' started by Loz, May 23, 2015.

?
  1. Full Brexit with "no EU deal" on the 29th March.

  2. Request Extension to article 50 to allow a general election and new negotiations.

  3. Request Extension to article 50 to allow cross party talks and a new deal to be put to EU.

  4. Request Extension to article 50 to allow a second referendum on 1. Remain in EU or 2. Full Brexit.

  5. Table a motion in parliament to Remain in EU WITHOUT a referendum.

  6. I don't know or I don't care anymore

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. If it looks like chicken, tastes like chicken it’s safe to say it is chicken
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Saw an interview with a sheep farmer in the Welsh borders.
    He’s hoping Mays plan goes through because under WTO rules, any lambs he tries to sell to his main market in the EU will be subject to at least a FORTY FIVE percent tariff
    Yes, 45%!!!!
    No wonder nobody else trades under WTO rules...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. They are not happy with the negotiation result and are kicking off, and not in a very constructive way. Hopefully it results in an improvement to the current backstop situation.

    I would love to see either of them go and negotiate with the EU. They have zero credibility.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. No.
    At best it demonstrates that the establishment is as split on this as everybody else.
    To say that the establishment wants to remain and the “people” want to leave is total hogwash.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. How can millionaire old Etonians NOT be the establishment?
    Plus the Telegraph, the Mail, the Express, the Sun, the Times?
    Iirc, Noobie has his own company. To someone on a zero hours contract, minimum wage or the dole, I’m sure he too looks very much like the establishment as well.
     
    • Drama Queen Drama Queen x 1
  6. Michael Jackson once tried to heal the world and that didn’t work out to good either lol
     
  7. Agreed, but as a remainer, why would you want it signed?

    Considering the backstop element, and what that would do in terms of hand tying the UK completely with no way to negotiate any benefits, and simply leaving us in limbo with the eu, what's the point?

    Surely you'd prefer to just stay?

    So why water down your chances in a second referendum, surely it's better to just have a stay or leave scenario?
     
  8. Then the establishment fighting the establishment should be seen as a good thing surely
     
  9. Actually it is worth mentioning what the referendum was about. The vote was about leave or stay, that was it. Not we leave depending on a or b or c, all that bumpf is remainers trying to distract you away from the purpose of the vote

    The only deal that fit's that peoples vote is wto/free trade
     
  10. Perhaps you should ask the millionaires and old etonians within the Labour party for that answer?


    Well let's just say, your accuracy in that post is consistent with the lack of accuracy in the majority of your other posts
     
  11. Id pay to see that. In the collaseum with lions and tigers
     
  12. Your getting to see it now but more with pussyfarts and wet lettuces
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. Quite...........When I voted I understood it meant Leave; Get Out; Depart..............I didn't vote for any effing deal at all.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Corbyn for PM.
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
  15. He'd last 6 months before someone from momentum put something in his tea and they would then put their real candidate in place
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • WTF WTF x 1
  16. Sorted.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  17. Not quite true, leave the eu would not include a backstop, ecj, the eu deciding who we can strike deals with and when, as Mays deal does.

    It's worth pointing out the biggest crying and stamping of feet is the side that suddenly, thinks democratic votes should no longer happen unless they can win everytime
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  18. democracy has been shown up to be a farce. with regards feet stomping: in order for change to be accepted the perceived benefit of change has to be bigger than the perceived cost. 48% of the country thought the perceived cost was too great. the other 52% didn't understand ;)
     
    #19878 MDUBZ, Dec 13, 2018
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2018
    • Funny Funny x 2
  19. Or 52% had nothing to lose ?
     
  20. ironically many of those that voted to leave accepted that they would be worse off, but that they wanted out (this seems to be what i'm taking away from those interviewed anyway). Some of the more deprived areas of the UK that got some of the biggest EU financial support actually had the highest desire to leave proportionally.
     
    #19880 MDUBZ, Dec 13, 2018
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2018
Do Not Sell My Personal Information