British Indy: What Happens Now?

Alison Thewliss MP among others in the party have never stopped asking questions at PMQ's and at comity, they have never stopped campaigning for its removal.
in the first few months of its introduction 190 woman went through the ordeal of claiming for a third child using the rape clause. i dont know the latest figures. i think its been around a year, a year and a half? since it was introduced. your such an arse noob.
just the SNP?
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b&q=the+rape+clause

 

Which is why I said hardly fin and you know fin, it was little more than a tactic on the 2017 general election.

So fin, away from 749er's continual anger tirade, what do you think on the ferries being approved to be built in december 2016 whilst the eu were pretending to not want no deal?

 

you would think a politician with 6 kids that claimed for each and everyone of them when she was low paid would of kept her gob shut.
you would of thought it fair to say in a country with a falling working age population that's participating in the process of making EU immigration unwelcome while putting measures in place to put them beyond the threshold of most employers, maybe would of kept her head down.
https://twitter.com/thesnp/status/1055130892782452736?lang=en

 

What is the objection then here fin, the fact the two cap is in place for a good reason or the fact the tories from westminster did it? hmmm? We both know the baby farms milking the system happens and far too often, the updated first two children for benefits is a fair system and does not stop anyone having more.

Now immigration, again, what part do you think particularly effects Scotland and why and how could it be resolved?

 

the baby farms milking the system? like the Tory MSP that claimed for all 6 when she was making 25k? aye ok. yer right, thieving basturts.

none of it. its all a conspiracy just to discredit the brexit process. i personally wont be advertising in the EU for techs, even tho i probably pay the highest rates in the area.

 

enough of the torys for a bit, their little helpers should get a look in every now and then too.

 

What surprises me on Labour, is how many momentum/labour people seemed not to know Corbyn has been anti eu for over 40 years and on record. Some have said they he is playing the long game waiting for the tories to explode then sweep in like a messiah, But labours plans in general (not corbyn or mcdonnell) is to stay in the customs union and single market which would be nothing like the vote but, they keep saying a Corbyn government over turning the vote would start to heal the nation, I did laugh

 

Exactly.
The BBC reference is pre referendum but is not part of any mainstream campaigning by any major figure in the leave campaign and the figures mentioned have now been totally discredited.
The other two references are post referendum.
Thank you so much for confirming that a hard brexit was never on the cards until AFTER the referendum and that the electorate therefore did NOT vote for s hard brexit, let alone crashing out with no agreements in place at all.
Leave means leave and brexit means brexit are phrases coined AFTER the referendum.
During the campaign, leading brexiteers were talking about a nice, cosy, cuddly, amicable brexit where we could retain all the benefits of being in the EU but ditch the obligations because "they need us more than we need them."
It was only after the vote that the tone changed.
Total con job.

 

yip, once again, telling the truth. by mistake.

 

It would be like the vote. Extreme brexit was only brought forward AFTER the vote.
Rather like an attractive girl thumbing a lift, car stops and big hairy bloke appears from the bushes.
Corbyn doesn't like the EU because current rules prevent re-nationalisation of railways, utilities etc.

 

Thank you so much for confirming that a hard brexit was never on the cards until AFTER the referendum and that the electorate therefore did NOT vote for s hard brexit, let alone crashing out with no agreements in place at all

I don't believe I did. Most leavers I know said the ideal outcome for them would have been an agreed deal but knowing the eu would try and wangle some way to keep control, saw wto and free trade as the only smart way out, a clean break. In many ways had they gone to wto straight from the minute of article 50, both sides would have had protection of agreed rules from the outset of negotiations.

Leave always meant leave and a clean break from the eu was mentioned an awful lot funnily enough, by many on the remain side before the election and during campaining. There are countless you tube video's of government ministers and labour mp's explaining what leave meant BEFORE the vote

 

yip, it gives him the chance (small, v,small) of introducing a Marxist utopia in the uk. solidarity for the workers, but no solidarity with those on the continent. independence for everybody says corbin, but not in his uk. the dick is a walking talking contradiction.
kinda like noob.

 

Members of the EU have voting rights.
Does Norway have voting rights?

 

I agree with that.

I also think the Remain campaign was crap too.
Basically theirs was ‘ if you vote leave you must be an uneducated racist’ which isn’t going to win them many friends. With a bit of ‘stay in the EU and things will stay as they are’ - maybe a slight majority didn’t want things to stay as they are, not worried about what would really make the country ‘better for all’ just change.

 

with a trill in the bank and no debt, the Norwegian's dont need a vote, they can also afford to tell the uk to ferk right off you aint joining EFTA.

 

Norway has used a third of its north sea oil, a third is in storage and a third remains under the sea.

 

Funnily enough, we were in Efta and one of the founding countries of it in 1960, and only left it in 73 to join the eec as it was then.