I think TB was asking was it a proper united nations meeting in the proper united nations assembly or a meeting for any old jack and danny in a sideroom, for people who are not all national leaders . In this case it was a follow on meeting from the paris agreement in 2015 and for largely those who would not have been entitled to be at the 2015 paris agreement, very small states or countries were amongst that group. In the snp's mind, "Nicola tells the U.N." In reality, she was one of many speakers and in one of the many side rooms
aye, that's the one. British nationalists of the noob variety are an odd bunch are they not?. a simple, aye, you done good there, or maybe a wee, that policy seems to be working kind of comment every now then would suffice. while this is only a bike forum and you are only a troll, you do have an uncanny way of exposing how the uk (not its citizens) work. interesting stuff.
and that sunshine, is the UK's problem summed up in just one word.it's "Ego". yer thrashing and lashing out out at everybody that disagrees with yah. not v,constructive. its created this illusion of us punching above its weight tag line, but, when the shit hit the pan, its realizing it cant back it up, the EU now want shot of us, and America wants to rape us. half the country can see it. probably more, and some hope to profit from it. sell brexit to me buddy, but i think you lack the skills (nothing personal) to convince me otherwise. maybe you could share your sources. maybe you could explain what is meant by, and who they mean, when they say "the UK" will prosper. you cant. which is a real pity. and why, i is always gonna be here to remind yah.
I apologise, I misspoke. I meant, "like a pumpkin and a pea in the same pod". Apologies for any confusion that wasn't my fault and which already existed in your mind. : o D
there's that ego thing again, you just cant help it, yer thrashing and lashing dont occupy my mind. your defense of the realm amuses me, ferk me you've changed, but whats occupying my mind right noo is, the thought of going outside in the frost, and uncovering the quad, then, making a track in the back field for the wee man to practice and update his off road skills.
Aye, finderman, concern yourself with things well within your ken. Monopoly, carting, licking frost off the windows, etc. So go bust out that pedal go-kart and get those tiny legs pumping. Activity is good for you and as mental exercise is clearly out of the question, start working off the deep-fat-fryer rust you have collected over the holidays. Good lad. (Goat, the ego on that boy!)
haha, 20odd mins to recompose yourself, administer the funys and think of a v,British retort. goat your predictable. all it takes is a v,simple question. if i had nothing better to occupy my time, i would pity you.
no. there aint one big enough to occupy me and loz's imagination. that's before we even mention his battered ego, its a lil swollen the noo.
. oh the joys. you know, i dont think there's enough respect going on in the world. Respect (Noun) 1. a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements. 2. due regard for the feelings, wishes, or rights of others. 3. a particular aspect, point, or detail. Lot of talk of respect doing the rounds in 2018. Seems the powers that be may have caught on to the idea that the United Kingdom is anything but united these days. Who knew? Talk of respectful debate, respecting democratic will, respecting results, respecting agreements and so forth. Especially from politicians and mainly those who don’t seemingly respect anyone or anything very much themselves. We’ve all seen the state of the Commons debates by this point, yes? The braying, howling, arrogant and condescending pie fight at the heart of our system of central government. So, yeah. Respectful. It appears, to any casual observer, yer actual politicians have suddenly developed a social conscience. (Now don’t laugh. They’re trying to be all sincere) . Apparently even the Queen managed a reference in her annual Crimbo day commentary t’boot – “Even with the most deeply held differences, treating the other person with respect and as a fellow human being is always a good first step towards greater understanding,” Which is nice and all very laudable of course. If however, you voted YES in the first indyref, or remain in the EU referendum? You’re probably not feeling a great deal of reciprocity on the whole respect agenda thingy. In fact you’re probably feeling ignored, intimidated, insulted and downright infuriated. You feel helpless and powerless. You feel very much cheated and almost certainly… disrespected. And now? Now it seems those who created your misery are looking for your respect, your tolerance and your understanding. It’s a pure mystery so it is. Oh, whilst of course still intimidating and insulting you on a daily basis because… reasons. . It also kinda helps, on a personal and communal level, if it truly is a reciprocal arrangement. Certainly if you want people to live and work together with any degree of harmony or unity. Just a wee pointer for the odd policy gonk who happens by. But is it really respect and tolerance they desire, or silent compliance and blind acceptance? Remainers (remoaners), supporters of Scottish independence (vile cybernats/tainted/separatists etc.), the Scottish government (generally Essenpee bad), the EU (furren bullies), immigrants (also furren and don’t go there) and all other agencies that aren’t behind the binary choice omnishambles of Westminster politics and its cheerleaders, aren’t exactly unfamiliar with the respect agenda meted out by the political class and their chooms in the media. . The bods suddenly asking for all this lurve and cuddliness would be the same political class who have made a mockery of the electoral process. Who sit in a house that is renowned for its venal practices and rampant party and inter-party backstabbery by the by. What they do for a living is commonly referred to as a dirty game. Some of the more cynical readers might say there’s a reason for that. So far as many people are concerned, currently it’s the place where the ‘art of the possible’ and the art of persuasion by debate has gone terribly wrong in the worst way imaginable. Its inhabitants and adherents support a system of patronage and politics that has arguably legislated against the welfare of its own population fer Gawd’s sake. They’ve more than also arguably made the UK ‘a global joke’ and now they apparently need your help to provide that joke with a punchline. They require a societal unity they’ve spent decades undermining in search of the voter demographic du jour. You can see where some folk would regard that as feeling very much like adding insult to injury. . Y’see, most people don’t have a problem with respecting and tolerating another point of view. They don’t have a problem seeing another human being for who they are and what they represent. They just want to get along with others and toddle through their lives with the least amount of grief possible. How and ever, should they be expected to sit on their hands in perpetuity while others with less respect or tolerance dump all over them from a great height? Mibbies they practitioners of the dirty game should have thought about that whole respect thing BEFORE they set about using their narratives to fracture society and alienate demographics. Before using the media and their interpretation of the art of the persuasion to determine who was a fit and proper human being (voter). Might be they should have thought about a lot of things and a LOT sooner than the fag end of 2018 and a looming conclusion to the Brexit process. No. It seems to me that the greatest source for problems over respecting the views of another, showing tolerance and understanding, come from the top down. From those who should have been an example and set a tone, but who use intolerance and disrespect as a tool to gather political and corporate advantage. . Thing about the ‘R’ and ‘T’ words though? Many aspects of respect and tolerance are earned. They’re not an automatic due. More importantly? They have to mean something to those involved. There has to be trust. It can take a long time to earn either and a heartbeat to lose both. It’s a sad irony that those who are perceived to foment intolerance and disrespect, require the exact opposite of those very qualities in others in order to thrive themselves. It also might be said that this time they’ve pushed their demands for the good will of those others too far. That their own insensitive and callous actions over many years have worn down the respect, tolerance and trust of too many who were supposedly in their care. Anyone out there feel that either the Conservative government or their honourable opposition have put the work in? Are they even remotely capable of walking the walk down that two-way street? I wouldn’t be entirely surprised if we found out the answers to those questions in 2019.
Wow, did you know the European Union's Directorate-General for Home Affairs published a ‘Study on the Feasibility of Establishing a Mechanism for the Relocation of Beneficiaries of International Protection’ – i.e. redistributing "refugees" – all the way back on 2010, which calculated Britain could handle a population of 184,038,648 million!? https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/s...df/final_report_relocation_of_refugees_en.pdf
wow, did you know the elected uk gov, in the remotest of chances of it ever becoming policy and if it wanted to, could of told em to fug right off, it aint happening?. my god, gerra grip.
I can always tell when fin starts to lose it, the rage come out as does the nastyness, Fin yours is the only party that has national in it, not labour, not tory, not anyone other than in dark days, the british national party. You said Nic had spoken at the united nations and left it open in a very missleading way, something the snp and it's supporters always accuse others of doing whilst denying they ever do it themselves so I'll seek some clarification from you sir This is the united nations assembly with the countries of the united nations in attendance If we were to play were's Wally with Nic, could you point out where she sat Or is the truth She attended a seminary, in the united nations building and a side room but never actually addressed the united nations at all? I'm sure you appreciate the consumers need for clarity when fake news is about fin
hmm, sounds like noob analysts to me. v,bitter. some might say, pot kettle, but hayho. yip, the UN, she has talked there, on many issues. nationalism, woman's and equal rights, climate change all that kinda stuff. generally gets a good audience, having never seen a bad revue, trust me, if she had, you would know. but you have to go looking hard to find any news of it a toll. its not and doesn't have to be a competition, noobster. simple facts to show there is other ways that work. tho, with a FPTP system along with all the other bull that goes with it i just cant see it happening across the uk anymore. so, i'm past caring, apart from the odd bit of "banter" on ere i dont think of it a toll. and had it not been for brexit, and the way its been handled by the torys and its opposition, chances are, half of our country wouldn't be back to thinking about this again so soon.
