both had restrictions according to the vote, that's how they all do it. The other thing linking the two, the snp have refused to accept both independance results by the people whilst claiming to want independence for them be respected, dem crazy snp rascals On this part Indyref 2014 - everyone registered to vote could vote regardless of where they were born. There was a requirement for those entitled to vote must be residents of Scotland and Scots not residing in Scotland could not vote at the request of the snp government In January 2012, Labour MSP Elaine Murray led a debate arguing that the franchise should be extended to Scots living outside Scotland, including the approximately 800,000 living in the other parts of the UK.[38] This was opposed by the Scottish government, which argued that it would greatly increase the complexity of the referendum and stated that there was evidence from the United Nations Human Rights Committee that other nations "might question the legitimacy of a referendum if the franchise is not territorial".[38]
and I was trying to show 749er that different votes have different standards and different requirements and him trying to claim apples and cheescake are apples and apples was pure piffleanious mischief
yip, there's restrictions and there's restrictions. one was advantageous for remain, the other was advantageous for better together. in the short term anyhoo. that was just spam. why do you bother?
another example could be lowering the vote to idealistic 16 years old that was advantageous for scottish indi, no? It was a reply to 749er was the reason for the reply, it was you that interceded with the spam mostly made from bolloxs and the need to do so, so what's your point?
endorsed by Cameron. maybe they aint as dumb as you would like others to believe. and according to you, to impressionable to make an educated choice. how easily could they of been persuaded that being out the EU was a bad thing? and would of been the end result of a yes vote? tho I see it wasn't extended to those 16-7 year olds elsewhere.. give an EU national the vote then tell them they will be deported if they vote the wrong way? not really much of a choice is it?
Oh the DUP... Not only won't they vote with May, they have annouced they will not abstain either. They are definitely voting against her deal MV3 Come on, Arlene, oh I swear (what she means) At this moment, you mean everything You in that dress, my thoughts I confess Verge on laughter Ah, come on, Arlene
They have two shots at this, Speaker John Bercow says the Commons has already agreed to a "two-stage process", with additional time set to debate the options again. Monday I think.
It’s a shite deal. Very noble to resign, but it’s not about people, it’s about the deal. It’s still shite and fair play to Arleen Foster for standing firm. Edit: don’t think I can blame the spell checker for that one!
I wonder how many remainers are still believing that this isn't about keep voting till you give the vote the eu want?
Yes I think you’re right. I’m starting to think they just like voting and are going to extend article 50 as long as they can to have more votes.
Perhaps they are hoping that no one will remember what it was about in the first place and praise them when (if) they actually make a decision.
IAN Blackford has called for a General Election after MPs rejected every alternative Brexit plan put before the Commons in a series of indicative votes. Eight proposals were voted on after MPs seized control of proceedings at Westminster. Every single one, however, was defeated. Separate motions which called for no deal to be ruled out, Article 50 to be revoked, for an improved commons market arrangement, for EEA/EFTA membership and for customs union membership were all defeated, as was Labour’s Brexit plan, a motion advocating a confirmatory public vote for any withdrawal proposal and a motion based on Contingent preferential arrangements. . what? another one? .. jeez, another round of campaigning, another load of manifestos. I wonder what my lot will have in theirs this time.
Noble? Its all about Mays legacy. When you are being unceremoniously SACKED (by the party behind the scenes), the best you can hope for is be believed when you make an announcement that you are "taking one for the team/ I'm doing this for you" shite instead of laughed at when you say it! Yes credit to Arlene for sticking to her principles. Oddly she hasn't always done too much of that... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_Heat_Incentive_scandal
