Sorry, I was on an historical mission to seek answers from long long ago (well 3 years, feels longer for some reason).
Because each section of the campaign had spending limits. Leave broke the rules on how the spent money by trying to channel it into one campaign whilst hiding what they were doing. Its not difficult to understand. https://www.electoralcommission.org...endums/campaign-spending-at-the-eu-referendum
Ahem https://www.politicshome.com/news/u...ameron/news/91572/official-eu-remain-campaign https://www.politicshome.com/news/u...-remain-campaigners-after-referendum-expenses
You’re going to have to help me out. Why could remain legally spend 5.8 million more than leave on their campaigns
Cos politics, bro'! Also, the alleged foreign money donated to Remain was legal whereas the alleged foreign money donated to Leave was illegal. Because reasons.
What could possibly go wrong with a 3 year old in charge? No, on second thoughts, look at Trump’s America!
Still no real answer to why remain was allowed 5.8 million more for its campaign than leave was. How am I supposed to learn. (If I google it all I seem to get is leave cheated, odd).
Alan has me on Ignore. Someone please pass my explanation on to him. It really is, just as simple, as that.