The side that votes correctly always gets a larger spending allowance than the side voting wrongly. Pass that on, too.
It wouldn’t be right to ignore you after you paid me to write SDP in a post. I was hoping for more than because reasons , but if that is all that’s forthcoming I will accept it and move on. It was after all a long long time ago. What’s happening now ?
Thanks. Both of these are probably correct as well as @Loz ’s explanation. Another question that stems from this sort of thing is, does anybody think something like this will or can be used to totally ignore the result of yesteryear?
The two links I posted that showed remain had multiple incidences of breaking their budget spend and were fined, aren't as widely promoted as the leave side but break the rules they did. The extreme remainers have tried to cancel the result with this and so many things multiple times and all have failed. Yep, covered it many times. If Boris wins and does count the clock down and doesn't ask for an extension, then the legally agreed default is we leave on halloween.
There was talk the other day of ‘vote lending’ in the Tory leadership vote. I did wonder if some of the extreme remainers would pick up on that for a new angle on why the referendum result shouldn’t stand.
Bl**dy @Loz cant be bothered to give a good explanation to help a man out. Probably fallen asleep listening to DSOTM.
It probably happened but to look at the last time it happened, see Corbyns selection when even those who voted for him as a candidate, even thought he would never be selected. He was their jokey up yours candidate, boy did that backfire. I'm sure the extreme remainers have got a few but , but, but's left, but they have largely used them all up and are running out of things to stop the peoples majority democratic vote to leave the eu.
FFS! If you are funded by players who are wedded to and embedded in the twin ethos of EU corruption and empire-building, it is literally impossible to fund Remain illegally. If you are committed to the principle of the UK leaving the EU, any funding provided for Leave is 99% likely to be illegal. The reason for this is the EU's Electoral Commission, a political arm of the European Commission. Jebus Goat on a space shuttle, it's like herding gerbils in here. There's "doubling-down" ... And then there's that thing that Alan does. *headshake*
From you article The deal could significantly change the way Europeans do business in countries like Brazil - which has one of the world's most closed economies. High tariffs have historically kept European competitors at a disadvantage against national industries. Similarly, South American farmers will finally gain access to European food markets. I'm sure the French and european farmers will love they have lost protection from the entire south american food producers. Something european countries pay heavily for through their eu subscriptions/
Well that didn't take long https://www.irishtimes.com/business...-south-american-deal-to-cut-tariffs-1.3940859 https://www.thejournal.ie/beef-farmer-trade-deal-4702670-Jun2019/ Funny thing, only 5 weeks ago, the eu were saying they would help the irish farmers because of uncertainty due to brexit and now they shaft them by flooding the beef market with argentinian and south american beef, poultry and sugar products https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-...ef-farmers-for-brexit-price-hit-idUSKCN1SM1A2 Let's see you wriggle this one varadkar as to the big fuss about american chlorinated chicken from the U.S., Brazilian beef exports were banned by Russia and China only 25 days ago due to...bse but now the eu wants to open the eu markets up to them https://www.globalmeatnews.com/Article/2019/06/03/Brazilian-beef-exports-to-China-halted-due-to-BSE
