No, Alan. In a Labour-stronghold constituency, votes necessary for the Labour candidate to win are created as required. Otherwise, non-votes count towards the candidate with the most votes. I shouldn't have to explain all this : o )
By not voting, you show your support for the candidate who receives the most votes! If that candidate promotes change, you are promoting change by not voting against him!
Now you’ve got me, it won’t. Unless no one votes or everyone votes none of the above, given the option.
I would say you show support for that candidate, isn’t it more you don’t care enough to vote against them.
I meant wouldn’t say it supports that candidate, but never mind. ‘A bird in the hand is worth two in a bush’
Since "no one votes or everyone votes none of the above, given the option" is as likely as the moon being made of cheese after all can we safely discount that option? Which must mean you are fine with things as they are?
I’m not allowed to dream then. I can’t see things changing so I will have to be and will probably vote Labour.
We can all dream & vote as we like including not doing either. What we can't reasonably do is not participate and then complain.