as we have seen with the failed bojo projects it wouldnt even cover the consultation and drafting of plans stage.
BT after writing off everthing that can (and fair enough) make over £2billion profit per year. The country as businesses and individuals need reliable fast digital connections, in a similar way that we need electricity, water and roads. BT after all these years have connected less than 8% of users to full fibre. FBTH accounts for just 1.5% of homes in the UK (mostly from Virgin who oppose BT). BT are making themselves a fortune -no problem- but the damage to the UK as a result will be huge and take a very long time to correct. Lets also have some perspective. The government are spending over 100billion on a railway from Birmingham to London which will reduce the travel time by ten or fifteen minutes. Its seems obvious to me that nationwide broadband for all is a far better way to spend the money.
Are you saying that Brexit is forcing these tax payers to leave the UK? If so why is that Labours fault? I understood the Tories were the party pushing Brexit, along with a sizable portion of the public?
if i mind right, the telecomunications are reserved, the scot gov(us) have had to invest half a bill just to reach 95% broad band coverage. the private componys wont do it.
Do you like being told what to do? Labour have said that the people, with knowledge of what a Deal will provide, should get the choice. Seems fair.
clearly they think we dont mind. thats pretty much all the leaders have said to us so far. No, we wont alow you to do this that or the next thing.
And he can build one of the railways over that magic bridge to Ireland. Between his obsession with bridges and buses and now this, I’m beginning to wonder if he doesn’t just see the U.K. as a sort of giant train set or a real life Legoland. I must admit that when I saw that bizarre interview where he claimed that his hobby is making cardboard buses and he likes looking at the painted faces of the passengers through the windows on the side, I fully expected him to say that he cackles manically as one by one he drives them off the edge of a table and then sets fire to them so he can watch the working class oiks burn
it cost 300-350 mill to build the the boarders railway. good idea, and successfull. you wouldnt think it going by the headlines. https://www.google.com/search?clien...&ved=0ahUKEwi09br6gezlAhXJQRUIHTDCBC0Q4dUDCAo
True that. And you know who else was obsessed with grand vanity projects like enormous bridges and super fast trains etc? A certain Herr Hitler.......
Speaking of Bridges, what was the insane London Park Bridge? Blojob spent £53million just on plans. There is nothing to show for it whatsoever. If he had been able to, he would then spend another £100million building it, covering it with trees. What total nonsense.
Ah.... it will probably come to light that he was boning the architect, but in common with the internal Govt report on the Jennifer Arcuri affair, the executive summary will find there was absolutely no connection between the coitus and the contract and it was all just a coincidence, but they will also decline to release the actual document.
The interview about busses was a stunt so that anybody then googling 'Boris bus' saw that interview and not a promise to spend £350 million on the NHS..... clever?
