999 Was It Really That Bad ?

Discussion in '749 / 999' started by noobie, Nov 7, 2016.

  1. In 04 I bought a 749Mono. I didn’t like the 05 “facelift” at all. That’s what happens when you let focus groups loose on your design. A bit like when Maserati dropped the pencil thin tail lights from coupe to use a boring standard layout instead. So for me the bikes to have are all the 04 models.

    the 749S got a peppier engine in 04 and from 05 on wards the 749R lost the Carbon fibre bodywork.

    IMHO the swing arm change is just aesthetics. I liked the cast swing arm but then I like castings as a method of manufacturing.

    today, I have an 04 749R and while it is a much better bike than my previous 749 the benefits come from the wheels and suspension more than the swing arm. Having said that, my yellow 749 mono was great on track and I thoroughly enjoyed owning it.

    the 916? Ducati took a formula from Honda and made it look better. It wasn’t that radical, whereas the 749/999 was

    Honda already had

    Single sided swing arm
    Side by side headlamps
    Twin air intakes under the headlamps
    Underseat exhausts

    on the NR750 in 1992
     
    #361 749er, Jun 1, 2020
    Last edited: Jun 1, 2020
    • Like Like x 1
  2. 2004 engine is exactly the same as 2003, 2005 was updated
     
  3. @Sev Don't all the 749 models have a 14t front sprocket?
     

  4. In 2003, the 749 and 749S had the same engine. Some people complained, so the 749S got a different cam profile to take it to 108rwBHP.

    All that happened in 2005 was Ducati changed from publishing rwbhp to crank BHP to bring into line with how the Japanese factories were quoting engine power. There was no incentive for Ducati to be tuning that motor as it had next to nothing in common with the 749R motor, which was a true 749cc, whereas the 749/749S were 748cc
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. [​IMG]

    I've always loved mine, had it from new, didn't mean to buy it, went to get a new solenoid for my monster and came out with this.
    On yer bike had it in their window, I love them in a race rep, the plain ones never did it for me, still terrific bikes.
    I can remember riding it home thinking had I done the right thing, that didn't last long.
    I keep thinking I'll sell it, until I ride it and fall in love all over again, marmite? I love it
     
    • Like Like x 3
  6. I thought the 999 was a complete redesign, before that they were versions of the previous model.
    I can remember reading how many changes they made from previous models, was it 140?
     
  7. It would also be interesting to see what changes may have been made, for example, from a pre-production model to what went into full production - if such a unicorn-type thing existed, of course!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. Someone will know, it was also used in a documentary on design, it was quite a thing in it's day.
     
  9. Well said, that all makes sense to me, perhaps I'm biased too.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. I like the 999 design
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. That's not correct.
     
  12. Someone else said it earlier, in race trim & colours it looks good but in the way it was sold & the way most people bought it, it’s odd. The fairing is not clean, which you expect a Ducati to be. It always reminded me of a boy racer adding spoilers & vents to a Corsa. The large single dial looks odd, the beauty of the single sided swing arm (which came straight back on the 1098) is lost & the thin slab sided appearance of the engine makes it look underpowered imo. The tail is also too high. Having said all that & having probably offended quite a few of the good guys in here, for me but it’s a bit like when Chris Bangle got his hands on the 5 series-Almost everyone hated it at first but it’s ageing well, particularly the better looking models.
     
  13. ^ The 916 and 1x98 have more silly vents than 999. Just saying...

    The asymmetric "beauty" of a single-sided swingarm is lost on me. They are less stiff, heavier, require ludacris axle nut torques and have a chain tension adjustment system which affects the chassis geometry. The one and only advantage over a conventional swingarm is the imaginary "easier to change the wheel" yabba dabba which is already negated by the silly torque on the axle nut. Not to mention someone has to sit on the rear brake to even torque the nut...

    And yes, I'm offended :D
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
  14. Where’s the “silly vents” on my baby then? ;):cool:

    4873D6DD-9098-4F4A-92E4-B1A219F0F924.jpeg
     
    • Like Like x 2
  15. Over here:

    upload_2020-6-2_11-48-22.png
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Definitely not-Need all the ventilation you can get there, I’ve fried two different rectifiers already!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. 749 2003 vs. 749S 2003

    crank 14621011A vs. 14621071A
    piston 12221102A vs. 12221151A
    cams 14821661A, 14821681A, 14821651A, 14821671A vs. 14821921A, 14821901A, 14821931A, 14821911A
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. @final_edition A bit, but the side fairing already has a huge exit vent for the radiator unlike 999 which exhausts from the trailing edge of the fairing :)
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information