You cannot be world champion in a sport if you successfully compete wearing footwear you can buy in Timpsons. This means that darts, snooker etc. are not sports. The definition works for me. Do you agree or disagree? Can you provide reasons why? Not a test, just interested.
Difficult one that...Im an angler and some of the worlds best Anglers will fish wearing an old pair of trainers, some of our best British anglers only wear trainers, and yes Angling is a sport, we have world championships national championships and many different Leagues.
It's only a sport if there is serious risk to life. The rest are games - football tiddly winks snooker
I'd make football interesting... me with a vulcan cannon on the sidelines... then the fuckers would earn their 24 million or whatever the cunt gets. ... and calm...
i'd say a sport needs to be interesting to watch with competitive action, so sorry that rules out angling, golf, F1
Bullfighting is just a mad abattoir with bells on. That's not a sport. You're not competing with anyone except the bull and he's going to get his. With a foregone conclusion, it can't be a sport.
I'm beginning to think that a sport requires physical exertion and a game or pastime doesn't. In which case, fly-fishing and shark fishing may be sports, but ledgering in a lake is a pastime. Darts and snooker are games not sports, ditto chess.
Once, a sport was anything that was completely pointless , unnecessary and that would not be missed if it hadn't been invented. As it had nothing to do with work,it was all about fun and entertainment I don't think the same applies now though So COME ON SCOTT!!!!!