Or to put it another way £270 of every horse. Mine cost £89 each. Which is much better value given that £54,000 worth of bike still wont make me Valentino Rossi or Marc Marquez.
Would love something like that, but it is beyond both my budget and abilities. mine comes in at £35/bhp - bargain!
I was joking but actually close to that... Wow, with that money you could get a Multi Pikes Peak, a Panigale R and a Monster 1100 evo. LOL
and when youve bought it, they'll simply bring out another super duper ultra limited edition version..
that's the nature of progress though, computers, phones, cars, bikes etc. there will always be a new and improved version coming out in the future...
my zzr1400 212 hp Dry weight on this bike is 215 Kg - Therefore power to weight ratio is excess of 1000 Bhp per Tonne.
45bhp and 105kg on the KTM300EXC I once owned was plenty. Especially as that 45bhp came all at once in a powerband as thin as razor blade. It was more of an ON/OFF switch. Craziest bike ive ever ridden.
What have you done to the bike to get that sort of power?? Impressive but just short of the 1000 BHP per tonne.
Trouble is it would go bang in 1 second with no oil in it . 268 kg kerb weight means a lot of fluid in there.
212/268 = 791 :tongue: Still beats my 745 BHP /473lb of torque per tonnne (Still good for an old Superlight ) Judges inquiry!!! Is it a genuine 212BHP?!? How much torque???? Yeeeeeeeeah I love Top Trumphs! :biggrin:
All pointless if the owner is 18 stone. All that weight loss, magnesium and carbon fibre is just a marketing gimmick, OK for Moto GP where all the riders are probably sub 10 stone. Back in the real world, because bikes weigh so little, rider weight really does make a huge difference. Thank goodness for Ducati there are plenty of fat rich blokes with 50 large burning a hole in their pocket.