With an 11,000 majority, which represents about 25% of the vote, a few low cost houses ain't going to make much difference.
and he is a Scott, albeit a posh one No, he is a very smart guy, a good local MP and strong on defence. The only problem is that he is soft on Europe. He has written several books and this one The Places In Between: Amazon.co.uk: Rory Stewart: 9780330486347: Books is a great read. The guy has balls.
I don't know. Local occupancy clauses are often attached to these developments, particularly within the Lake District National Park.
It is true that conditions can be attached to planning permissions, or restrictive covenants imposed on the land, so as to require local occupation, or prevent selling on within x years, or preclude sub-letting. The trouble is, monitoring whether those impositions are being complied with, and taking legal enforcement action if not, are expensive and unpopular functions. Who is going to do this? Who is going to pay for it? They are likely to fall by the wayside in a few years.
its all relative init. i aint skint but financially i would be better off back on the tools full time if i was payed for the hours i do in ere
Do you repair affordable cars with zero-carbon footprints which are made from renewable materials, fin? If you do, get on with your work. If you don't, go find some Green work to do. DB, I like your orange top.
Scotland pays in £1600 per head in tax above average, and gets back £1200 per head in tax above average. That's a shite deal. Secondly, England chooses the UK gvt, so you got what you voted for in fees, prescriptions etc, as did we, hence we don't have them. That's democracy. You even chose to reject PR! Stop blaming Scotland for England's poor choices.
