Topless photo`s

Discussion in 'Lounge' started by GLYNH, Sep 14, 2012.

  1. Royal kate`s topless photo`s !!! what do you think?
     
  2. Yet more fuss about someone who is so irrelevant to my life. I can't believe that these pictures will actually help to sell a newspaper. I mean, any of the red tops are packed with professional models with their boobs out. Why would anyone be interested in what this girl's breasts look like? They're just breasts. Are hers extra special or something? If she hadn't married in to royalty and her boobs were shown in the Sun would anyone bat an eyelid? Being famous doesn't make your tits any more interesting. Perhaps if we all stop talking about the Royal family and ignore them then they may just go away.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. If we Brits weren't such prudes when it comes to nudity then it wouldn't be such a big deal. If all our beaches allowed topless sunbathing and more women did it then it would become the norm and this sort of sensationalist claptrap wouldn't happen. From her perspective I can understand the anger as they were on a private estate and these pics had to have been taken by someone who shouldn't have been anywhere near them. Nicky has also said that she would probably have been slated by the press if she'd gone out wearing an off the shoulder dress and shown a white strap mark. Poor girl can't win can she?
     
  4. ive not seen the photos and i guess yeah there is some sort of interest to see...........however its not the tits out bit thats the issue, its the long distance, massive lens, stalking bit that i guess will be the invasion!

    another point is that its a bit contradictory given her brother in laws antics recently.....though again its the invasive nature of the pictures.......
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Its just wrong. regardless of who she is , what she looks like etc. She didnt ask for the pics to be taken and published. Think how you would feel if it was your child or partner having their bits paraded like that under those circumstances. Their are plenty of paid models of all types available to look at on the net or in magazines .
     
  6. Are royal tits different to anyone else's tits?

    If such a big deal wasn't made of it there would be less demand for this sort of behaviour by the paparazzi.

    No one kicks up a stink about cameras in changing rooms of high street stores, google earth/street or the endless CCTV cameras invading people's privacy.

    Get over it....it's a pair of tits.
     
  7. Totally agree Anth, hence my point about topless beaches, a pair of tits is just that, nothing unusual, women have them, unless they've been unfortunate with cancer, they're there for the purpose of feeding babies, it's nature, it's natural, get over it!
     
  8. but your missing the point its about invasion of privacy not the fact its her tits, arse, or little finger!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. And for jiggling to attract men's attention! :upyeah:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. and you obviously missed my point about cameras in changing rooms, google earth/street and CCTV invading privacy too.
     
  11. no one kicks up about cctv......................where have you been?..............oh thats until it identifies the offender in their little world fiasco, then thats ok.
     
  12. This thread is useless without pictures :biggrin:
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. In your condition.....:cool:
     
  14. [​IMG]
     
  15. Andy, see my original post, I agree they must have been taken without her knowledge and yes that is an invasion of her/their privacy, but we all suffer with that don't we? CCTV etc everywhere ? Only yesterday when I parked the car in the short stay car park at Gatwick, the ticket had the car registration number printed on it! I know you can say its for my own safety/security but isn't that an invasion of my privacy?
     
  16. Thats ok im armed!.......:upyeah:
     
  17. The monarchy relies on publicity to survive. They want it all ways.

    With that though when it comes to royals I prefer headless to topless. Cromwell had it right.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. In a public street, shop, car park we all get photographed, all the time, and it's legal.

    How would you like to be photographed without your knowledge or consent in your own private garden, bathroom, or bedroom? And the photos published?

    I thought not.
     
    • Like Like x 2


  19. Pete, it may be legal but is it right? It's not right to take pics and publish them of anyone, royalty or otherwise, without their consent, and I am not going to google them for a cheap thrill of seeing Kate's norks! As for taking photos of me, well I'm not ashamed of my body, I do go on naturist beaches after all, but I don't think anyone would want to photograph and publish me somehow!!
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information