I still think shes bloody stupid for topless sunbathing out in the open?? Probably pics of the Queens tits somewhere? Not the same appeal tho? Ties them together in a knot to save on underwear :biggrin:
After some study it cannot but be concluded that, Royal or not, Celeb or not, the view Your Prince, revered or not, gets when his wife walks to the bathroom every morning is truly bliss to the eye and of great rarity... a thing of beauty is a joy forever... and beauty is absolute... as all Ducati owners know!
:biggrin: Now THERE'S an image! I think Philip has to splint his up nowadays? Two lolly sticks and some ducttape?
nothing worth seeing, she is entitled to her privacy, it's not about being prudish, it wasn't on a beach but in private grounds..if some bloke took pictures of your wife in the back garden topless I am sure you would have something to say
It can't be that much fun being a royal, doing the job 24/7. You should be able to have some privacy without being spied on by some twerp with a long lens. If you go out of your way to make your holiday as private as possible, then that should be respected. I'm just glad that the British press have now seen the light (post phone-hacking scandal) and that there are some things that should remain private. Glad Buck House is suing the magazine. As for half the population having breasts, it's not an argument, is it? Social mores ensure that you don't flash your jugs in the local supermarket or at the office. So they have connotations. That is precisely why the paparazzi want to photograph them - forbidden fruit. And that is the same reason why they shouldn't be allowed to. And if anyone says it would be great if all women went topless all the time, all I can say is thank god they don't. That would make everyday life truly stomach-churning.
I haven't bought a magazine (that wasn't purely Bike-or Computer- related) or a newspaper in twenty or more years. I don't read them for free, either, I barely glance at them. I don't look up prurient photographs of "celebs" on the web (other types of prurient photos are OK though :wink: ). If we lived in a world where people respected the privacy of others, these sleaze rags would go bust overnight. *sigh* Lovely thought, that. I could express an opinion on all this but, so what? People who want to see this kind of stuff - photos of individuals who don't want their photo taken in a private setting - keep the whole shitty industry going. If you feed the hyaenas, you get more hyaenas. Oops, opinion might have slipped in there somewhere. Oops.
Cool zebra seat! Im not a biggy on the the Royals sorry..... No its not right you have your privacy invaded .... Not right to have it splashed over some paper. However if you are in the public eye and in although a long way off in public view its a no brainer there will be some pap lurking about. If there's a small chance you could be seen and your famous then your pretty much going to be seen. Bit of a silly girl ... especially after Harry the other week!!! Mind you can't think of any worse a photo then Fergie sucking some blokes toes ....... put me right off my frosties that one did! If she had a brain like mine she would have shoved a cushion up her front that would have given them something to report
I like the royals But Diana went through all this crap surely William and Kate should have learnt that the Papp are never far away and getting ones assets out will make the news. Once bitten twice shy and all that :-/
Conversation went like this: Archer: Shall we go to the beach? Nick: What's in it for me? Archer: Sand :smile: Ps Badoom tsh............I'm here all week :wink:
