I just don't understand why these conceited people should think that just because they've acted in some films the rest of the planet require a running commentary on their lives. Lots of people manage to get married and divorced without involving the press.
Generally speaking, it isn't the megastars** that want to provide the running commentary, it is the parasitic/predatory media who pander to the insatiable demands of the lowest form of human life on the planet. Or something like that. **Nobody/Wannabe types you see on reality TV (LOL at oxymoron) do want to provide a running commentary but I care even less for them than the nothing I care for megastars and their domestic shite.
OK, if you insist. Spoiler: Nutshell Generally speaking, it isn't the megastars** that want to provide the running commentary, it is the parasitic/predatory media who pander to the insatiable demands of the lowest form of human life on the planet. Or something like that. **Nobody/Wannabe types you see on reality TV (LOL at oxymoron) do want to provide a running commentary but I care even less for them than the nothing I care for megastars and their domestic shite.
True. But the "stars" themselves more often than not manage the publicity like a business. This made the front page of the Telegraph this morning for God's sake. OK, a passing reference in one of the plethora of Fulham-based mumsnet comment columns that pad out the inner pages, you might expect. But the front page..? I mean, its not like there's anything important going on in the world....
if you know the media will report it anyway, why not try and control it? Agree with Loz. It's the Katie Price's of this world that insist on broadcasting their stuff, not the Will Smith's
That's good. I'd hate to start thinking you were a credulous moron just now when I have started believing you are the smartest man I know.
