British Indy: What Happens Now?

Discussion in 'Wasteland' started by Loz, May 23, 2015.

?
  1. Full Brexit with "no EU deal" on the 29th March.

  2. Request Extension to article 50 to allow a general election and new negotiations.

  3. Request Extension to article 50 to allow cross party talks and a new deal to be put to EU.

  4. Request Extension to article 50 to allow a second referendum on 1. Remain in EU or 2. Full Brexit.

  5. Table a motion in parliament to Remain in EU WITHOUT a referendum.

  6. I don't know or I don't care anymore

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. She can't be all 3 :Wideyed: you are in trouble now :Finger:
     
  2. your right, she cant be.
     
  3. cant have it both ways, yours and yours are happy to peddle it.
     
  4. That Dianne Abbott just doesn't seem Labour to me.

    It's hard to put a finger on it, but I just find that she comes across as though she talks down to people all the time, and I find her very patronising.

    Its no wonder labour have lost much of the working class vote having people like her on the front line.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. wonder if he will do a trump and reverse his thoughts on the privatizing the nhs?. labour supporters wont vote for that.
    but then again.
     
  7. Dianne the hypocrite :upyeah:
     
  8. hows he gonna keep the welsh on board if he is planning on messing with barrnet?
    what happens if some clever sod brakes up the English spend in to regions?. hmm. not the brightest is mr nuttle, but then again.
     
  9. Is that the best you can do ?
     
  10. She is from the I know best metropolitan elite who send their children to fee paying schools whilst telling everyone else they should use the local comprehensive.

    I don't have a problem with fee paying schools, but I do have a problem with hypocrites and Dianne Abbott is amongst the worst kind.
     
  11. Nope.

    [​IMG]
     
  12. 32,000 ballot papers sent out and he won with 9,000 votes. Less than half the Party voted and less than a third for their own leader.
     
  13. :Hilarious:. god that's mental. 7mins of tim accuses, nuttle spouts. but Dian's the worst kind of hypocrite?
    god help us. :Facepalm:.
     
  14. One minute we are told that all negotiations need to be done it private and not even in Parliament ( for which the government is prepared to go to court) yet one of the idiots walks into a meeting with all his thoughts and views and details on public show (including denigrating comments about the people he will negotiate against).

    Stupid is as stupid does.

    'Have cake and eat it' Brexit notes played down by government - BBC News
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  15. It was also pointed out that the person showing the notes is not with the government but a researcher aide to a tory mp that is not even on the brexit committee or department but is a known ardent pro remainer.
     
  16. Not forgetting her view that "on balance, Mao did more good than harm". North of 50 million people were killed in the cultural revolution, did this pass her by at Newnham? Or perhaps expunged from her mind on her bike trip to East Germany with Jeremy.
     
    #4277 corrosio non forsit, Nov 29, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2016
    • Face Palm Face Palm x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  17. Looked like a load of old nonsense scrawled by someone who's bored while listening to someone else talking...
    The bloke with the long lens camera should be prosecuted for invasion of privacy,the media prosecuted for publicising the nonsense and pretending it had some serious meaning,and the airhead researcher sent home in tears to mummy for masquerading as a responsible adult...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. I would have thought that all MPs and researchers who work for them are already bound by some very strict confidentiality rules. Civil servants certainly are and used to have to sign the official secrets act so I guess MOs do too.
     
  19. To be fair, you'd have to be a bit naive to even take the notes as anything other than rubbish scrawl.

    The facts are the government aren't giving anything away, therefore wild imaginations are just making up the news they think that suits them when 'Journos' publish stuff like this as news.

    If it was May walking along with them on show then you'd have to ask why she'd wrote that down, that'd be fair enough.

    But to take notes written in such a way by somebody far removed from Brexit discussion and/or negotiation as serious i think you're wasting your time, i think instead you should really be asking the question as to why they'd positioned them perfectly for a photograph to be taken?
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information