:Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm::Facepalm: Your goal is to antagonise on every thread, it is your purpose in life for some reason. So your views here are ludicrous and worthless
Just for the record Dukey. Almost one in three cars, or 810,000 cars sold in Britain, come from Germany, making the British island (including ,,,,,"finland",,,,,..,,) the biggest export destination for German car producers. It is around a fifth of the total number the industry exports worldwide, according to the German car association, VDA. (Source is Handelsblatt Global a German publication with 2015 figures) Think Dukey is a masquerading sciolist like others on here.
Speaking of language... and because some on here love and believe the BBC [sic] lol Migrants should have to learn English, say MPs and peers - BBC News
Half of this forum would have to be deported. Have you seen some of the grammar on this thread? :Wideyed:
sad that you cannot perceive someone voicing an opinion different to your own without you accusing them of being antagonistic,, perhaps that says more about you than anything else...
I don't think its quite going to play out so black and white, regardless what many may spout and what the media seem to insist on feeding. Its not a matter of our 'demands', its a matter of what works for all. The things i genuinely don't believe we'll accept are: 1: Paying any further fees to the EU in terms of contribution (tariffs perhaps) 2: Entire free movement of every EU citizen (some exclusions will apply) 3: Being tied to the customs union (if we are we cant open up trade with other nations) Now, thats not to say some middle ground won't be found. Ive been reading and hearing lots of good ideas this last few day which include specific market 'free movement' allowances, so agriculture for an example or vehicle manufacture, I'm sure they'll be many more. However thats handled isn't up to me but it makes sense. Its controllable which gives the voters what they want and keeps industry happy. Its also easier to manage and analyse which should be even better for the workers themselves as they won't be ripped off. Now if that counters tariffs being applied to those particular sectors its fine. However, Some tariffs may have to be applied, but thats when it comes down to mutual benefit. So things we both 'need' may be cancelled out, otherwise whats the point? You charge me 10%, i charge you 10%....pointless However, with us being out of the customs union it opens Britain up to trade deals and supply of goods from a much wider supply chain. Expand the supply chain and you'll see increased competition in supply, therefore if the goods supplied by the EU members become uncompetitive due to tariffs its more likely they simply see a reduction in spend with them, therefore they lose out unless they sharpen their pencil or find increased trade elsewhere from within the Eu block We are not entirely dependant on the EU to supply us, its just that we've been in a supply agreement with some of them for many years. Changing that isn't the end of the world. It happens all the time in business, sometimes its beneficial to all just to shake things up.
Oh dear...even the Independent is reduced to printing positive news... The economic consensus was horribly wrong and here are the real reasons Brexit is succeeding | The Independent