British Indy: What Happens Now?

tbh , i doubt it.:Banghead:

 

who / when did call a racist ?

 

btw,, i dont think it was half of the US,, from what i remember he got less than half of the votes cast in the lowest turn out in their history.. iirc about 25% of US .

 

apology accepted.

 

It does seem to be the curse of the modern snowflake

We've seen it with the independence referendum, the general election, the Brexit vote, the American election.

All sides say they respect democracy and respect the final democratic vote. All sides willingly take part in those same elections and yet when they lose, they bitch and squeal like spoilt kids that democracy has failed.

 

noob,your full of pish :smileys:.
lets try this on you mr democrat
vote no to indi and
A. you get super duper devo max (the prefers option but was refused by Cameron before the edinbro agreement) did we get devo max?
B. you wont get removed from the EU
C. we wont do this
D. we wont take that
etc, etc, etc. sitting down there in essex with nothing better to do. you haven't a clue what your talking about.
give it a rest man. or just keep giving me copy and paste examples i can use later.
your choice.

 

An interview of Trump by Gove has zero validity. It's like Goeebels interviewing in Hitler.

 

Silly me, I forget U.K. democracy is only allowed in Scotland and the snp's version. Fin it would be refreshing it you didn't have to fart to remind yourself of what you had to eat last night.

 

exactly loz, certain purdah and finance rules where broken to. but hayho
noob noob noob, there you go again. determined to display yer ignorance in vote you didn't have, on a process you don't understand, undertaken for reasons you cant comprehend. your a right wing apologist.
watching your posts over the last month or so i am genuinely surprised you haven't been on here before to explain that camoron was only checking that it was cooked properly when he fucked yon poor pig, seeing as its standard practice round your parts. ffs man
good day to you kind sir. :Facepalm:

 

meh.

 

fin i am here to educate and assist as part of my care in the community project so I will help you.:grin:

When you enter into a democratic vote, everyone does so in the hope their side wins and largely up until the votes I mentioned, that seemed to be okay

Now we have people saying I am willingly taking part and if I lose, then I will ignore democracy and insist we keep having votes till I get my own way. That is not democracy, that is self interest snowflakery.

because those types rarely see beyond their nose, they do not see the standard they are setting, again let me help you

Lets use the Scottish vote, (as you seem to think the U.K. is all about Scotland you silly thing) The vast majority of those that voted, voted to stay in, salmond himself said that was it, for a generation was his words.

Now lets say they want another crack at the whip because they feel the EU out vote has let them down even though we voted as the U.K. and NOT as regions.

But let's say you have another independence vote and you have a yes by a few percentage. That would mean the score would be one all 1-1.

Using YOUR own standard, those who said we want to stay in the U.K. SHOULD be allowed to use YOUR standard of "I don't like this vote so we need to vote again" You wouldn't be able to deny them that as it is the standard you used yourself. Add to that they could say one all, so lets have a third vote as a decider.

Lets then say the third vote has stay within the U.K. as the deciding vote. Now if you are honest you know the snp and it's sheep will ask for a fourth vote and a fifth and a sixth until it gets it's way.

All of this whilst at the same time saying we have to leave the U.K. WITHOUT even knowing what the details of the 2 year agreement and then an additional few years to see even if it works.

This highlights the wish for the snp is NOT what is best for Scotland and its people but more the blinkered view of lets leave the U.K. and sort everything out later

I hope that helps