Just a little reminder in case anyone is left in any doubt: http://www.vernoncoleman.com/euillegally.html
Yes it does. If you look on the link on your own post,it's missing the "L",off "HTML". Try clicking the link on my original post: I deleted the link and cut/pasted it correctly.
Duke highlights how things have changed in politics and in some sense, reality. We have a democratic vote and they refuse to accept it calling everyone who voted different to them Xenophobic, racist, islamaphobic, uneducated, you get the drift. Trump wins the democratic vote in the traditional ways and the losers call every one who voted for him Xenophobic, racist, islamaphobic, uneducated, you get the drift. Scotland demanded a vote on leaving the U.K., they got it and decided to vote and the losing side said all those that voted to stay were Xenophobic, racist, islamaphobic, uneducated, you get the drift. All of them say they respect the democratic vote but they don't as all have asked for another vote as they didn't like the most recent one. Politics seems to have changed from the democratic votes decides the matter, to if some of the losing whingers keeping crying like a spoilt kid in the back of a car screaming when they don't get their own way, then suddenly everyone will back down and give into them. facebook campaigns seem to be replacing democracy. In regards to the subject it's clear the eu and bernier have only two songs to sing. They want 10 years worth of contributions from the U.K. after we have left to fill the gap no one else in the eu wants to and is refusing to pay and 2, their brief is as much about punishing us to deter others and little else. On the plus side, as I look out of my window, the kids are going back to school today, yay
noob, you have been consistent in calling the "yes" moment raciest and xenophobic while also being consistent in providing no proof. not a single pic of any of the leading campaigners in front of a dodgy bill board. Que scotsman or daily express headline" THAT IS the nature of uk politics now, you refuse to recognize the circumstances behind that particular vote. lets remind ourselves. just days before the vote the support for YES had risen from 23-28% 49-54% in favor which led to the uk gov closing down and heading north. with a "VOW". and the threats of loosing EU membership. only by certain fractions of the EU mind, the background we can go in to later. if i can be arsed. lets say in 2016 just days before the vote the EU and Cameron came back with a deal that stated an end to free movement and the withdrawal of ECHR which later proved to be bollox, would you consider the matter closed? like fuck you would. i recon its you and yours that dont respect the democratic processes. the definition now being "any which way but lose". the simple fact of the matter is.noob, you devote too much time commenting on a subject you know nothing about. being by far the biggest exporter to the EU by population share its the whinging Scots that are gonna pay the biggest price,both economically and with the taking back of control,democratically. but, your precious and "sacrosanct" democracy allows us to continue campaigning. even if we have to continue to listen to your continued whining.
Fin, campaigning is what you do before the vote not after As to scotlands place, the snp's constant attacks on the tories in Westminster has hardly helped their cause for being heard. That cock up is laid firmly at nics door
yip, thats the language now "attacks" "conspirator" "traitor" when actually its highlighting issues, holding to account and asking questions.
well, being 10+years in power you will have quite literally a gazillion examples to offer. all with supporting evidence and links i am sure. a wee reminder, the EU question is a cross party thing. with cross party support with a mandate up here. tho they (some of the others) seem to have forgot the vote they took to support the scot gov in finding ways of protecting our place within the single market and customs union.
