the lack of history behind the tweet says a million words also. a wee interlude while noob frantically trolls the red tops. yes loz yer right. you and the unnamed expert seem to agree, i just owned their sorry asses. *smug grin* a wee jurno trick there brw.
Excuse me? I was just laughing at that vein on the side of you head that goes into spasm every time you realise you look foolish. Anyhoot, carry on. You're doing remarkably well. *fin grin*
The interlude was me coming back from the spoons after a traditional breakfast fin, I did not pop off to the cia, mi5 or even fleet street. Let me ask you fin for a straight reply and none of your sillyness of 300 years and brigadoon nonsense In the brexit vote, it was clearly a uk vote, why do you think it should not be taken as a uk vote when that is what it was and following on, 2,679,513 Scots voted in the brexit vote why do you think they voted?
Then I shall fin in the blanks using your mindset fin, see if it rings any bells We only accept U.K. votes as U.K. votes when we win, we only accept independence votes as independence votes when we win, has shown to be not the words, but the actions of the snp government And you continue to throw scorn on the tories in westminster then at the same time scratch your head asking why they do not want to share more than they have too. 67.2% of Scotland's population who could vote, voted, are you now saying none of their votes in U.K. elections count when the snp lose lose because I think if you were being honest, you would accept that is what your saying. Had the U.K. voted the same as the snp government you would have declared it as a U.K. vote, had the people of Scotland voted the same as the snp government you would have declared it as a just vote not needing a further vote less than 3 years later. You decry democracy when you lose and any other attempt to see it as anything else is the snp trying to kid itself it abides by democracy.
Ssssh, noob, I don't want to hear any more about GERS and someone called "The mooth" and that's exactly what i get every time you pinm down the finm.
yip, and quite frankly i am getting board going over the basics. but really, i dont mind, i am stubborn that way, so, no real loss if i have to fill in the missing blanks of yer "education".
Your new name is "finmbot" - you have to be a computer programme because nothing human could go on & on like you do : o D
true. but when yer right yer right. so its always worth the effort. and being right is what i do. aye, a RIGHT pain the arse. i know already.
I tried talking about woodwork in here once and fin came in saying it was the tories at westminsters fault why so few Scots got wood, he is obsessed so yeah he might just be a snpbot Fin any reply or will you be using the standard attempt at a divert?
When dealing with facts rather than the snp's and kim jun Sturgeons version, fin goes all sleepy, a bit like a foreign criminal when caught, pretending he cannot speak English. He always wakes up though with a dodgier memory than before the sleeps, funny to watch but it must be quite confusing for him
Bernier was on point today, he said any future between the eu and the U.K. must have legally binding agreements in place and then went onto say that the U.K. has a moral agreement to pay a divorce bill, it must have slipped his mind that there is no legal basis within article 50 to pay any divorce bill at all, he's a rascal.
So he is saying that the UK must have legal agreements with the EU but that the EU has moral agreements with the UK? That Bernier chap is mennal.
