Rees-Mogg would get ripped to shreds by Labour with his privileged background and business interests.
People likeDavid Cameron, JCB heir Lord Bamford, David Rowland, Sir Tony Baldry, Sir Edward du Cann, Lord Bilimoria & Arron Banks all of which had or have companies in the BVI according to the Panama Papers Scandal...
Silly boy. There are approx 30,000 residents on and around bvi which come under bvi. Your usual idea of spending the top 5%'s taxes is still as boring as it was the fits time, 45% of the nations economy comes from tourism and it's the poorest that are asking for help, not the richest.It's also worth pointing out I feel that some of the same people you have pointed out do pay tax but you want it paid on every country they visit or stay in. There are quite a few reasons to ask why they think we should help not least as to why they use the American dollar as their currency and why they only seem to want to know us when poor planning forgets that the same time every year for 2 months out of 12, they get the shit kicked out of them by the weather and still yet continue to build houses out of wood not concrete. But to say fuck you based on your thought that everyone in bvi is a multi millionaire shows again your points are more often found on an anarchist forum than an informed one. I don't suppose you forgot Labour contributors and supporting companies who also use bvi? Vitabiotics springs to mind and I'm sure should I dig I would find many more
Not a chance. It's fashionale these days to have a go at the rich and privileged, but not many have been able to land a glove on him, no matter how hard they have tried. He'd tear Labour a new one.
Good old (very old) fashioned inverted snobbery is alive and well among angry, hate-filled moral crusaders. Ironic really when you consider that Rees-Mogg doesn't exhibit a shred of snobbery himself.
Nope Rees-Mogg is just a tit. Anybody who names his kids after Popes and Saints from centuries ago deserves to get the pissed ripped out of him. And then lets the nanny bring them up. What a cock. No chance of ever being PM.
$1.5tn worth of assets based on the BVI to avoid paying their way. Estimated at $750 million p.a. of tax dodging. https://www.ft.com/content/16b4c5a8-55ba-11e7-9fed-c19e2700005f http://uk.businessinsider.com/briti...shore-haven-where-trillions-are-hidden-2017-6
He's fucking marvellous. Good old figaro used to make me laugh but Dookie is No.1 these days. Top entertainment.
Well he's a clever, serious-minded and articulate tit who weighs his words and brings sorely needed intellectual rigour to political debate and he expresses himself without bigotry or ill-temper which puts him streets ahead of you on all counts. What about people who name their children after soap opera characters and get the tax payer to bring them up via the welfare state? Do they deserve to get the piss ripped out of them because of their social origins?
I'm puzzled to understand how a parent names their children should decide the standard of politician they should be? Moggy would defend any politician of any party if there was a debate about political rules and regulations and that person was correct. He is in effect an intellectual giant in a sea of minnows but a person that well versed will often be attacked by those lazy politicians whose choice of weapon in a battle would be "look what he called his kids, he can't be serious"
Rees Moggs views -whilst he is certainly entitled to them- on abortion and gay marriage might be a limiting factor on his popularity? Asked whether his opposition to abortion applied in cases of pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, he replied: "I'm afraid so."
The thing is, at least he answers the questions. Watch Corbyn and most other politicians sidestep everything thrown at them. People see this.
Which wasn't his full answer, the bit you missed was that he believed in the sanctity of life and that the moment the baby is created then that baby has rights too. He isn't the only person to believe this nor is this view held only by people of a faith. He has also said that he believes his faith provides that marriage is between a man and a woman. in the same interview however that many lazy people quote without actually having seen it, he also said ‘Marriage is a sacrament and the decision of what is a sacrament lies with the Church not with Parliament. ‘I’ve never been invited to a gay wedding before, but I can’t see why I’d decline. It’s not for me to enforce my morals on others. If someone asked me to a drugs rave I’d refuse because it’s illegal. ‘But gay weddings are legal. I wouldn’t get on my moral high horse. If I went, I hope I’d enjoy it.’
Yes its often the case. I was laughing at May this morning when she was asked " whether Boris was unsackable?".
