The delightful Sandra works at the salt cellar in http://www.saltcellar.org.uk/ which claims to be a church based volunteer project, I didn't see much love and compassion in her post https://www.facebook.com/sandra.goodall.5249 As to the delightfull mr Bonsor, he has form, Wait till i tell his teacher Miss Charlton from the class of 1970, Class 2 of Langford CP School
Unfortunately they'll be total fucking imbeciles on both sides of the fence, these two aren't worth getting angry about judging by their grammar.
Just a little reminder to all of those who claim people didn't know what they were voting for: https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1009740052490670
What's he going to do, ask them how they voted as their bobbing past or not ? She must have been pissed writing that surely ? Who the hell wants to sing an "AHTNME"
There is another option There is no conspiracy at all and for the first time in many decades, we have a government who genuinely wants to put the people and their democratic vote, first? imagine that
Pragmatic German MEP tells Tusk the reality of British values in the Brexit process. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-41735409/brexit-eu-stance-unfair-mep-hans-olaf-henkel-says
I am, why does everything have to be about big business? We are seeing a shift away from humans doing jobs, those humans who do work must receive a higher wage, that is unlikely to happen, even in the lower end jobs, if they flood us with cheap labour I remember an interview on Ian King on Sky where he was talking with one of the largest employers in the private sector and he said business does not want brexit otherwise their costs will go up, Ian king said, do you mean wages? He replied yes.
I've been thinking this for ages. Business had their say in the run up to the vote when they tried their best to scare the electorate into voting "Remain". They lost. Business was not given the vote on 23rd June 2016. The people of the UK were.
The first years of austerity were unavoidable, the hint was the letter left by Labour that there was no money left, I would agree that whatever you want to call it, austerity, living within our means etc, we needed some slack after 7 years and certainly policing, housing and education needed that boost. But we also need some honesty in that we keep expecting miracles whilst paying in invisible ink
What austerity? When did that happen? Government spending for 2016 was 42.1% of GDP, about 18% higher than is sustainable. Again, what austerity? And what is austere about not spending money you haven't got and will never earn? Who will it be austere for, the infantilised and institutionalised generation who's votes will be bought with borrowed money today or the people as yet unborn who will have to go short to pay for it tomorrow?
Ah Gimme but you are forgetting one thing: What if? Oh no, sorry, that was a line from the remake of The Time Machine. No, I meant: Magic. Money. Tree.
