I found this as well but it made no sense to me. What settings do you think this is saying? Regards Steve
I had it at the back of my mind that I had seen 230 rear. have had someone, on another forum, tell me 48 on the front. 230 is bloody tight. Regards Steve
That document is showing 63 and 230Nm frt/Rr. Looks like a torque listing off of the digital manual. There was a draft one doing the rounds on the 'net which was all over the place but that one looks pretty good. Yep, 230 is tight but better that than the wheel coming loose. still see 916 et 'al thru the workshop with loose nuts and just the safety clip holding it in place. best get the shredded wheat on order