Random Youtube Video

Discussion in 'Lounge' started by Boomshanka, Mar 16, 2019.

  1. unconfirmed test conditions but big question mark on vehicle's integrity looking at rear wheel behaviour as a result of frontal impact at 4mins 14 secs.

     
  2. I'd be very glad to keep 2.2m-wide 'cars' off our streets, whoever makes them!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Knowing how the tech is built in teslas, I would never own one. I had one as a company car for a year, even then it was a bit of plastic I despised.

    Never buy one.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. #825 NineNineSix, Feb 20, 2025
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2025
    • Like Like x 1
  5. What a shame he didn't crack open his dense skull and rid the world of one more selfish cunt.

    'I don't even wanna watch that' - Tough shit son, those are your actions, stop hiding from them.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. ^ I don't understand the sentencing - driving ban should have been 5 years plus.
     
  7. I do, soft policing. Scared to sentence to the point of disagreement in order to avoid public outcry. Aka, the UK. The fact the police officer in the clip is being sympathetic with the criminal whilst replaying the footage of which he is 'struggling' with just proves the point further.
     
  8. Like he's gonna honour the driving ban. :mad:
    What impressed me was the copper's narration while riding some pretty hairy manoeuvres. Kept completely calm throughout.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9.  
    • Like Like x 3
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. Pair of right numpties giving us all a bad name... At least it was a result for the police.

     
  11. It was so high speed that they even managed to stop and fill up with petrol during it!
     
  12. What a pair of twats! Thinking of all the police resources (= our taxes) to try to catch them. As you say - giving us all a bad name, just like all the balaclava'd scrotes on Surons...
     
  13. Fuck about, find out.
     
  14.  
    • Like Like x 2
  15. £3,200 per hour all in for Police helicopter.
     
  16. That's most likely the direct operating cost. Factor in scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, airworthiness renewals, hangarage fees and public liability insurance and that figure is quite a lot higher. It's more cost effective to fly it than have it sat on the ground, where it just burns money. Still an expensive platform with which to catch scrotes, but effective nonetheless. Wonder how long before they will be replaced with FPV drones, an area which has seen massive advances in IT/Tech in recent years.
     
  17. either way, still a very poor use of resources on this occasion, when you Factor in that there was clearly no coordinated ground response with the targets seen leisurely buying some fuel for the motorbike..
     
    #839 Chris, Apr 16, 2025
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2025
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Like Like x 3
Do Not Sell My Personal Information