Naa not that long ago, tbh those statements are open to interpretation, I.E. I hardly ever get 1st class mail delivered with in 2 days of posting now days, but as I said I have had a case dropped because of stating never received the letter. Each Case is different, I guess. What if you are away for a month or 2? For me the basic principles of law are the same, if you stand up and state in a court of law that you never received it, for what could be an untold amount of reasons they cannot prove you did. How many times have we read in the news that joe blog postman found with 6 months worth of letters in his garage etc over the years, there is always that doubt
What is under discussion here is a rebuttable presumption. A document served by post is presumed to have been received by its intended recipient. That presumption stands unless it is challenged. The party challenging the presumption might (or might not) be able to persuade the court that the document was not in fact received (i.e. rebut it), so that service was not effected. By the way if you have already taken action in response to a document, don't bank on being able to get a court to believe you didn't get it.
Surrey Police...arrgh....women magistrates....post menopause......hate motorcyclists....you are going to get rendered.
Pick up the phone and call wherever you sent it too That way you can stop worrying Bloody men make life harder than it needs to be :Angelic:
are you loco? why would you bring something to the attention of the authorities that you want to disappear?
:Inpain: It's already got their attention Looks like a better option than I didn't receive it sir and they choose to decide his fate without him being there :Wideyed:
if she was my secretary she would be in a world of trouble should she reply to anyone from a government agency without my express permission... DB what have we learned here?
That speeding doesn't pay and gives you sleepless nights worrying about receiving a letter :Angelic::Angelic:
