Usa_naziland; darpa have been funding large projects to progress towards a terminator style robotic automaton. To do the bidding twenty-four hours a day seven days a week too exterminate those the elite decide are not 'on side' with their master plan. One peice of good news from the E.U is to enforce the writer Isaac Asimov: three laws of robotics. However the vile americans* do want robots that kill. *word amended. Please stop using "that" word. It's not funny anymore. Thx ET
The biggest risk to mankind is not terrorism, is not religion, is not global warming. It is automation. I just hope it holds off long enough for my 20yr old son to have a full working, enjoyable life
Well with the novel plan of UBI (universal basic income) been trailed in finland. Theoretically UBI ignites an egalitarian start for shorter working weeks across the western world. The downside is that people will revolt against the corporations dumping workers for machine workers. Moral purchasing is the only way of defeating or modifying corporations behaviour to share the wealth created. Whilst they will always plan to replace the lowest tier of workers with machines & then move up the pyramid of power. Reducing societies mass workers into a leisure pursuit orientated sphere. We have the georgia guide stones as a concrete epitaph/eulogy too the elite & freemasons plans.
An AI has beaten top poker players, nobody taught it how to play, it was given the rules of the game and then through playing learnt what did and didn't work. One surprising aspect of it's game was that it would risk a great deal for a small win, which was totally unexpected by it's human opponents. Oh the humanity! Poker computer trounces humans in big step for AI | Technology | The Guardian
DARPA Wants To Create The Terminator | Apartment 46 Is more chilling because they fund these projects, as most silicon-valley companies are actually fronts for the military industrial complex of usa_(constantly break international laws)_naziland.
@GunZenBomZ - I asked you nicely yesterday. You ignored my request and have done it again just now and I've had to delete one of your posts. This time I'm telling you. Now stop these inane and abusive rants.
In about 20 years I see our youth waking up and realising it wasn't all the oldies fault. Instead of saying we have no future, the old people had one why don't we? Then in about 20 years the penny will drop and they will realise the very same technology they say is their life and they can't do without, is the very same technology that is seeing humans as irrelevant and that is why they have less of a future.
You cannot un-invent technology. Once the genie is out of the bottle. It is there (and a simpler procedure to replicate). The best we can hope for is for international bodies to legislate and outlaw the use of certain technologies in circumstances the general world population deems immoral. Sounds Idealistic? Well that is what has happened to a large degree to keep the use of chemical and biological and other weapons use to a few limited applications, where their use ostracises the guilty party. Not perfect, I'll agree. But a practical solution, and the technology can then be spun off into useful, morally acceptable uses.
A real comparison may be health enhancements. While the world seems to have a set of guidelines or rules around use and production of cloned human parts and, ultimately, humans entirely. But we all know that there are sections of the world where they are doing exactly that. Sometimes movies can give a really nice snapshot of what's to happen: 3rd avengers nivemie age of ultron is s grey example. Starts with 'for the greater good of man'..
