I am considering fitting a HM quickshifter to my 1198s. Has anyone on here fitted one ? Is it just a single plug (little white block) Where the hell is the plug ?
This is what can happen, imagine the damage all these little bits can do to the inside of your engine.
My 848 evo had a QS 7000miles and still fine. But it is a wet clutch so does that make a difference ?
The wet clutch doesn't make a difference but the 50+ BHP & Torque through the same gearbox does. Fitting a quick shifter is the easy bit, it's the rebuilding of the gearbox after its sh1t itself that's the tricky bit
The HM is meant to be pretty good. Mick at HM is a helpful guy if Ive remembered his name correctly. Theyre only in Edenbridge and the roads from Linfield to Edenbridge are nice, ahem. Pop in and ask Cupid
Thanks for the input everyone, So if a wet clutch has no bearing on the quickshifter cocking up the gearbox that means my 1199 should've shredded its gearbox long before I sold it. 10,000 miles on the clock and quickshifter was constantly used and it had a damn sight more HP than my little 848. @cookster was that the gearbox from your 1198 ?
The 1199 gearbox is a lot stronger gearbox and was designed with a qs in mind, Ducati’s engineers also capitalised on the opportunity of the “blank canvas” project to increase dimension between the centres of the six-speed gearbox shafts, enabling larger diameter, stronger gears to transmit the enhanced power output. New for a top-of-the- range Ducati Superbike is a “wet”, oil-bath clutch. Based very closely on the design of the Multistrada and Diavel components, the clutch assembly features a “slipper” function and a progressive self-servo mechanism that compresses the friction plates when under drive from the engine. While enhancing frictional efficiency, this also results in a rider-friendly light clutch lever “feel” at the handlebar. Conversely, when the drive force is reversed (over-run), the mechanism reduces pressure on the friction plates, enabling a true racing “slipper” action, reducing the destabilizing effect of the rear-end under aggressive down- shifting and provide a much smoother feeling when closing the throttle or down-shifting under normal riding conditions.
Not all 1*98 with QS eat their gearbox. All the ones I know of, incl SP fitted as standard, have. Tbh that is enough to stop me fitting one to even the multi
Ive read numerous and countless posts of the 1098/1198 gearboxes being fecked by the QS. I had one on my 1198 and it was so crude after a couple of dodgy episodes using it, i decided that it was best not to use it anymore. So I deactivated it on dash. Ive seen a few posts on here, .ms and .org forums whilst I was searching for qs advice. The one on the 1299S is like cream by comparison, but I only use that when I fancy a blat. I still clutch mostly when everyday riding.
I don’t understand why people think a QS will break a gearbox when in fact it will do a better job than a human at changing gears. I use one for racing a 1098R and there aren’t any problems but it does feel a bit agricultural compared to more recent bikes like the 1299.
Because significant anecdotal evidence shows that 998/999/1098/1198 bikes with QS' eat their gearboxes. 1198 was fitted to strengthened gears to try and solve this issue but the 1198 gearboxes still get destroyed. The fact that your 1098R hasn't lunched its gearbox yet is not proof there isn't a problem.
Speaking to a few different engine builders, super finishing the box helps reduce the risk. How many have a 1098R with a nova box? Or have had it stripped and checked?