I know it became an emotive topic when the euros were threatening to 'make' biker folk where it, but is it soooooooooo bad? Bike riders are often moaning about motorists not looking/seeing them and how the motorist should look, but are bikers doing all they can ? I started wearing a £2 hi vis vest after an accident, (mainly to keep the Doris happy) and to my surprise I didn't start coveting men's bottoms or start listening to show tunes. I have however recently got out of the habit of putting it on before a ride. Is it the BMW riding, bearded IAM rider image that puts people off? Thoughts?
Just doesn't look right on a Ducati does it Seriously if it did make a difference then Hi Vis has to be worth it What would be an idea is to find out how many bikers in accidents were wearing HI Vis Watching the accident programmed on tele all the bikers I have seen knocked off have not had Hi Vis on I have noticed more bikers around here wearing Hi Viz and do stand out but is that because I'm a biker would I notice otherwise
God point. I was biffed off while wearing a winter jacket with hi vis patches. Silly cow that knocked me off wasn't even looking in my direction! But, doesn't mean it doesn't have benefits some/most of the time IMO.
i wear one sometimes if im going into busy riding enviroment ie - quite often in europe, round paris.... rush hour M3 etc i find the cheap ones rip to shreds though at higher speeds, you end up wearing a ripped rag i got a hi viz body warmer from work, thats actually quite comfortable, has pockets, and stops some of the chill, problem has got the company logo on it :-(
My problem is not with High Vis per se, but with compulsory High Vis.We shouldent be forced to wear it, why is the onus put on the motorcyclist to be seen as opposed to the motorist to see us. Finally all modern bikes have bright daytime headlights. If they cant see the headlights they certainly wont see the high vis especially on faired bikes where the riders torso can be almost hidden.
I wear Hi vis if riding at night, or on a dull day. If its bright sunshine, then I wont. Its all just a case of standing out against your environment. I agree with eyore thou, shouldnt be made compulsory. It would be a very short journey to make people wear white helmets
There was a smidsy accident just down the road a few years ago. They "didn't see" and pulled out on an articulated lorry. If you can't see that, I doubt you'll see a hi vis.
Yep, when people are distracted or just not looking, it's amazing what they miss. However, I'm sure a hi-vis would and has saves some people. Not for me though :wink:
No doubt, but I agree with others on here that I wouldn't be happy if they were compulsory. Not for me either.
To be honest, I am quite astounded as to how poor the driving appears to have become recently. It really makes me think twice about actually owning a motorcycle. Nobody seems to bother indicating anymore and there appears to be a growing percentage out there who obviously do not hold a driving licence. Last saturday we were on the motorway in heavy ish traffic and two pin head cars came steaming up behind us. They could not get past so both flew up the hard shoulder at around 100mph undertaking everyone. I think its down to the lack of traffic police, they are few and far between. Is it just me or have the driving standards seriously dipped in the past 12 months or so? I flashed a guy out from a side junction the other day, no thank you from him etc. Half a mile down the road he just slammed the brakes on and shot off left, no indicator or anything. I was mega angry, i would have pulled him out through the car air vents if I had got near him. Ignorant arrogant bar steward.
I will say, indicating seems to be going out of fashion. When people do bother, half the time they do it during the manouvre instead of signaling the intention beforehand. It isn't difficult, you know.
What puts me off is a lack of style. I think that style is important on a bike. What is the point of tarting up your mount with carbon bling, and then sitting on it like a paunchy old git in a hi-vis waistcoat? You have a responsibility to look as good as your bike does (sorry). I can still see the bloke who showed up at my Ducati dealer's once to take delivery of his brand new 999R or whatever it was. He was wearing suit trousers and office shoes and his leather jacket. He looked like a knob. I don't care if he'd just come straight from the office. There are some things you just don't do. Look at those fab photos of rockers in the 60s going down to Brighton. Now imagine them all in hi-vis waistcoats..... Right. It even hugely annoys me that bobbies wander down Oxford St. on foot in hi-vis jackets. They have a pointy hat on for God's sake - do they really need to look like roadsweepers too? No wonder respect for the police is dying out. I will stick to my flash leathers to be seen. But there is no way I am going hi-viz. On a bicycle it's a bit different. With no armour at all, you just have to pray you are seen. You probably already look like a knob anyway on it so what's the difference really?
For most its all about appearence...what they look like to every one else, Bless. so when you get to court and they ask what you did to make yourself more visible you can say......nothing. and their excuse ..." sorry I just didn't see him" will be an acceptable response
I'm sure there are those who don't care what they look like and just opt for their bike because it gives them the best overall riding experience irrespective of what anyone thinks. I'm also sure that those people are a tiny minority of bike riders. I strongly suspect that choice of bike, mods and riding gear is a subtle mix of internal factors - how it feels to you and external factors - how it makes you look. This is true for almost any brand choice which is seen by others. There is also a difference between hi-viz and trying to be invisible. Hi-vis vest today - all-over hi-vis suit tomorrow. Why stop at a waistcoat when you could make even more effort to be seen?
If I'm particularly concerned about being seen I stick my headlights on. Gotta be at least as good as a hi-viz vest.
I wear hi vis vest in the winter, after dark or if it's dark and gloomy. And as far as style goes Icon Mil-Spec vest looks reasonably nice :smile: Bright red bike, red and white helmet and low beam lights switched on at all times, if this doesn't help during the day then I don't think a hi vis vest would make much of a difference. Oh, and 70mm Termis without baffles... surely if someone is blind AND deaf they shouldn't be driving a car? :wink:
I just think that hi-viz vests are the thin end of the wedge. We all started to put our headlights on more than 3 decades ago. Then they had to be on - came on with the ignition. Then some people started on a hi-viz vest craze. Next step - these will be made compulsory Then it'll be a hi-viz helmet, because some report will "prove" that they save lives. Then it'll be a hi-viz suit. Etc. etc. I am bored with the health and safety brigade, with hard hats, cycle helmets, hi-viz and everything else. I am bored with the idea of living life in cotton wool and never taking the slightest risk, and trying to insure yourself for every single eventuality. I thought the whole point of motorbiking was to cock a snook at that attitude, but the whole holier than thou, Mr Fucking Reasonable, let's never exceed a speed limit, goody-goody mindset seems to be encroaching on all sides.
Hi Viz or Headlights on - Not for me. If it is 6' long x 6' high x 3' wide and bright red and they can't see it, then a little bit of yellow cloth or a bit (we are talking Ducati here) of yellow light isn't going to make a "Blind" bit of difference. Reflective clothing at night is really useful, but hi viz day or night - waste of time on a motorbike.