Rcs16 Or Rcs17 With Oberon Clutch Slave??

Discussion in 'Technical Help' started by Air Duck, Nov 2, 2016.

  1. As the title says, what's the best size RCS clutch master cylinder when used with an Oberon clutch slave cylinder?

    Anyone running an RCS master with an Oberon slave please chip in with how it is for you!

    If you can't answer that do you know the size of the OEM Panigale clutch master cylinder piston size? There's so many numbers on the OEM m/c I don't know which, if any, refer to the piston size.

    Not feeling this post's gonna get much love, c'mon - YOU can make a difference - it's time for change!!! :loudspeaker: :balloon:

    :thumbsup:
     
  2. If using a 29mm slave (not sure which bike you have), the master that is "recommend" is the RCS16.

    I accidentally bought an RCS19 with the idea that the larger piston would push more fluid, ergo lighter pull.... but no. Was heavier than a 1 ton concrete bollard....

    The feel is much smoother than OEM though and when installed on my 1198SP, it feels as light as my 748s...

    How's that for some love??!!??
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. Ah Bullitt mate that's some real love right there!:balloon:
    Yes the Oberon unit is 29mm (I think the stock 999/1x98 slaves are 26mm iirc).

    That makes sense regards the RCS19, as I understand it the larger the m/c piston the more force is required to activate it (because you are forcing more fluid through the same diameter hose in the same amount of time) but requires less lever travel for the same effect.

    The opposite is also true, a smaller piston will require less effort but will require a longer 'pull stroke' (here we go...) to achieve the same amount fluid movement.

    @Bullitt Where did you get the RCS16 recommendation from? Do you know what size your OEM clutch m/c is?

    My concern is whether the RCS16 will disengage the clutch fully before the lever hits the clip on (or require most of the travel) vs the RCS17 increasing the pull force unnecessarily, given that I won't be able to return them once I've found this out I was hoping to order the 'best' size and be done.

    Thank for your input! :upyeah:
     
  4. The guys at Moto Rapido advised that was the best combo.

    The stroke of the RCS16 is adjustable, 15/16/17mm if I'm not mistaken. I'm afraid I have no idea of the spec of the oem master.

    Drop the guys at Moto Rapido an e-mail or call them. All very helpful guys.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. I have an RCS16 with Oberon slave on the Monster, works fine with a nice smooth & light action on either setting (16/18 or 16/20).

    I have it on the 16/18 as it makes it slightly lighter than the 16/20 and clutch plate separation is the same on either. :upyeah:

    (edited to add; could be the other way round on the settings, but works fine either way)
     
    #6 Dukedesmo, Nov 2, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2016
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. Got a beringer master cylinder on mine along with the Oberon and its light as a feather....i might be wrong in saying this but i think the type of RCS master you use has more of a difference when used in conjunction with calipers (more fluid to move) than with clutch slaves....
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Thanks, yeah I love the guys in parts at Moto Rapido - knowledgeable and friendly. Cheers for the input! RCS is adjustable to either 18(red) or 20(black) ratio settings.

    That's great feedback - thank you!

    Again thanks for the detail! Do you know what size your Beringer is?? Cheers!
    FWIW The piston size of either clutch or brake master cylinders has a big difference on the feel and operation of whatever is being controlled (ie either brake or clutch) Smaller m/c master pistons will have a lighter-to-pull lever but will require a longer lever travel to achieve the same end force.

    Thanks for the inputs so far guys - much appreciated! :upyeah: :trophy:
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. Fwiw this is next-to-useless response I received from Oberon this afternoon after asking whether a 16 or 17 would be better:

    "Thank you for your email . If you are thinking about changing your master
    cylinder ,obviously the 17mm will move more fluid and give you much more
    tolerance and a better selection on your gears. But 16 or 17 will work .
    Hope this will help .
    Kind regards,
    Dawn
    Customer services"

    "much more tolerance and a better selection on your gears" WTF!??
     
  9. Well... My current setup works perfectly so at least you know that works...

    Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
     
  10. Yes, thank you! However I don't know the size of your m/c. Their website calls it a 'CR012', whether that means it's a 12mm piston I dunno? I tried to send an enquiry but the link to their contact page ended in 'You don't have permission to view this page'.

    Feel, travel, light/heavy-ness, etc etc are related to the size of both the master and slave piston viewed as a system, it's the ratio between the two that determines 'how' it will perform.

    I think the OEM Ducati clutch slave piston is 26mm, Oberon is 29mm.
     
  11. Yeah I'm probably gonna do exactly that - get an RCS16. The 17 will require less travel, which I like, but at the expense of a heavier pull force.

    Is your clutch fully disengaged some distance from the left grip and is the clutch easy to modulate say in heavy traffic?
     
  12. I have an res on my rsv4 and my supermoto... Beautifully made but ive gotta say the beringer looks a lot prettier...

    Sent from my SM-P900 using Tapatalk
     
  13. I've only ever had this setup on the bike so can't compare before/after but I get the same amount of separation/movement of the plates (around 2.5 - 3mm) in either configuration.

    Works fine and progressive in traffic etc.

    In the softer setting I need to pull it in a little further but in neither case does the lever actually touch the bar, as it reaches end of stroke just before, but I do have the lever adjusted almost fully out as I have fairly big hands/long fingers so it may not work so well if you've got small hands?

    It has a slightly softer pull than my 916 which has a standard master cylinder but with an Evoluzione slave which, IIRC is slightly bigger than the Oberon (either +0.5 or +1mm I think) but they both achieve around the same separation.

    Both are leagues lighter than my Guzzi (cable-powered) clutch though...
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  14. Yeah but mine will only end up smashed/scraped soon anyway! Love those V4s!
     
  15. Mate, that's really good to know - thank you for taking the time to write that :upyeah:

    Yeah I think as long as the lever doesn't come back to the bar the total plate separation will probably always be the same or similar, it seems to then come down to how much hand force is required to get it and how easy the clutch is to modulate when required.

    OK I'll bang in an order for a 16 and will get used to it anyway, thanks again for your help and to all the other contributors - cheers guys! :upyeah:

    :checkeredflag::trophy:
     
  16. She means less likelihood of clutch drag from the 17 because a given amount of movement will translate to more movement at the pushrod, which means you don't have to be quite as perfect with your bleeding.
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information