Corrected. It was more used on the bus as an example. I think it actually said, £350 million is what we send them. Let’s fund the NHS instead (giving no exact figure as to how much would fund the NHS). I’m sure some can find it’s way there if we can leave without being penalised by the bratty behaviour too much. That’s up to whomever we vote going forward though and not something that can be done by the current government. Demanding a cheque be sent to the NHS immediately after the Brexit vote (as the NHS boss did), is yet more bratty and childish behaviour.
Jesus Christ, that f**kin bus again. I don't know of a single person that was going....in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in....Oooo, what does it say on that bus?. £350m a week! That's it. I'm voting to leave. FFS
It was obvious what the bus meant, it highlighted if we had that much money to give the eu, then shouldn't we be spending more at home? It again, and Steve's comment re-enforces it "The Politically ignorant of the electorate" shows that the most ignorant of all were some of the extreme remainers. Actually if you wanted some lies Brexiteers warned the eu was moving to the united states of europe, remianers thought it was panto season and said "ohhh no it isn't" http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-13/juncker-unveils-grand-vision-united-states-europe Brexiteers warned that the eu project was trying to control all countries armies, remainers said again "ohhhh no it isn't" https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...my-defence-PESCO-France-Germany-defense-video Brexiteers warned of the eu project controlling individual countries budgets through a central eu budgetary control, remainers said "ohhh not it isn't" http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/CONT/home.html But yes, I do wish they would just hurry up and get us out of the pigs ear that is the eu
there's been so much shite written by you lot to save yer blushes i forget but was it not 350mill less the rebate less the investment in the areas where the uk gove wont?
fin the quote was £350 million was promised to the nhs, that has shown clearly not to be the case. It was very clear if we give that much to the eu then we should be spending more at home. The £350 million varied because all countries have a fixed expected rate BUT if a country has done better than expected then they are expected to cough up additional sums too as we have in many of the last few years as we have been one of the most successfull countries in the eu. Most of the above was pre election. We know how the election went so onwards
Oh Christ Guys - please give it a rest. We voted. Decision made. (Right or Wrong). Now let's make the best of it. The biggest problem (as I see it) is the politicians. Remember what Plato said 2,500 years ago:- "He who most wishes to rule is he least fitted to do so."
yip, give it a rest, other threads are available so,it was 350 less the rebate less the investment in areas the uk gov wont?
Rhino why come into a brexit thread then complain we are talking about brexit? Fin, you lose on indi 1, you moan, you huff and puff on indi 2 and when your own leader hides it in the cupboard you moan, and when you lose brexit you moan Have you ever thought about being a sex line operator with all that moaning? You'd make at least 2 groates an hour, maybe more
Most of the conversations re brexit now are about the negotiations and looking forward. fin just for you https://www.pcworld.co.uk/gbuk/computing/laptops-703-c.html
deffo, just clarifying another one of your...eh...facts. brw, if its tech advise im after i will ask the designer not the abuser. here exe, weesht stick to what you know. have a look at these pair o boobies
I know how much you like accuracy fin and have often used one of your sages as a bastion of accuracy https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/new...-investigation-ofcom-alleged-accuracy-breach/ but back to the stage 2 talks
The Remainers were told that a vote to leave would have immediate and dire economic consequences. Was that a lie also ?
It was £350million gross, but the rest came back with strings attached, in other words, we were told how it was to be spent.
pathetic, i will up your complaint on a single tweet from a single complaint with raft of bbc presentations on just one issue alone. Below is a complaint lodged with the BBC. The complaint relates to coverage on BBC Scotland of an accusation levelled against the Scottish Government by the Scottish Tory party and the subsequent failure of BBC Scotland to provide similar coverage when the accusation was shown to be false. On Nov 27th, the National Audit Office issued a press release in which it admitted making a mistake in a report it had released to the media thirteen days earlier. The NAO admitted that figures for basic rate income tax payers in Scotland had been overestimated in the report and that this was the reason the report had been pulled on 14th November. This admission exposed as false, claims made by the Scottish Tory party on 14th November. Ruth Davidson’s party had claimed the NAO had withdrawn the report due to “bullying” by the Scottish Govt. The claim was reported by BBC Scotland in several radio bulletins that same day and also in a lengthy item on the evening edition of Reporting Scotland. Viewers to Reporting Scotland heard the Scottish Govt being accused of “bullying the NAO to try to coverup the truth”. In all of the news reports the Scottish Govt was heard on the defensive. The accusation and its denial were both presented as equally possible, despite the fact there was literally no evidence to back up the ‘bullying’ claim. Given the bullying claim was considered important enough to be covered on Reporting Scotland then it is odd that the admission from the NAO, which proved the accusation was false, was not covered at all. The press release from the NAO was arguably a *bigger* story given it both highlighted an error from a respected organisation *and* provided evidence that accusations by the Scottish Tory party had been fabricated. Reporting Scotland had an obligation to report this development. Yet it did not do so. Those viewers to the November 14th edition who may have believed Tory accusations true, were thus denied an opportunity to have their opinion revised. The result is that a baseless accusation has received widespread coverage, whilst the truth has been all but ignored. The only reference to the NAO admission appeared on Radio Scotland at 19:30 on Nov 28th. logical my ass.
