1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

British Indy: What Happens Now?

Discussion in 'Wasteland' started by Loz, May 23, 2015.

?
  1. Full Brexit with "no EU deal" on the 29th March.

  2. Request Extension to article 50 to allow a general election and new negotiations.

  3. Request Extension to article 50 to allow cross party talks and a new deal to be put to EU.

  4. Request Extension to article 50 to allow a second referendum on 1. Remain in EU or 2. Full Brexit.

  5. Table a motion in parliament to Remain in EU WITHOUT a referendum.

  6. I don't know or I don't care anymore

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Corrected.

    It was more used on the bus as an example. I think it actually said, £350 million is what we send them. Let’s fund the NHS instead (giving no exact figure as to how much would fund the NHS).

    I’m sure some can find it’s way there if we can leave without being penalised by the bratty behaviour too much. That’s up to whomever we vote going forward though and not something that can be done by the current government. Demanding a cheque be sent to the NHS immediately after the Brexit vote (as the NHS boss did), is yet more bratty and childish behaviour.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. I do not think they did tell them, they used it as an example
    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Jesus Christ, that f**kin bus again. :rolleyes:

    I don't know of a single person that was going....in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in, in....Oooo, what does it say on that bus?. :bucktooth: £350m a week! :eek: That's it. I'm voting to leave.

    FFS : unamused:
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
  4. It was obvious what the bus meant, it highlighted if we had that much money to give the eu, then shouldn't we be spending more at home?

    It again, and Steve's comment re-enforces it "The Politically ignorant of the electorate" shows that the most ignorant of all were some of the extreme remainers.

    Actually if you wanted some lies

    Brexiteers warned the eu was moving to the united states of europe, remianers thought it was panto season and said "ohhh no it isn't"
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-13/juncker-unveils-grand-vision-united-states-europe

    Brexiteers warned that the eu project was trying to control all countries armies, remainers said again "ohhhh no it isn't"
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...my-defence-PESCO-France-Germany-defense-video

    Brexiteers warned of the eu project controlling individual countries budgets through a central eu budgetary control, remainers said "ohhh not it isn't"
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/CONT/home.html

    But yes, I do wish they would just hurry up and get us out of the pigs ear that is the eu
     
    #10844 noobie, Dec 18, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  5. there's been so much shite written by you lot to save yer blushes i forget but was it not 350mill less the rebate less the investment in the areas where the uk gove wont?
     
    • Face Palm Face Palm x 1
  6. fin the quote was £350 million was promised to the nhs, that has shown clearly not to be the case. It was very clear if we give that much to the eu then we should be spending more at home.

    The £350 million varied because all countries have a fixed expected rate BUT if a country has done better than expected then they are expected to cough up additional sums too as we have in many of the last few years as we have been one of the most successfull countries in the eu.

    Most of the above was pre election. We know how the election went so onwards
     
  7. Oh Christ Guys - please give it a rest. We voted. Decision made. (Right or Wrong). Now let's make the best of it.
    The biggest problem (as I see it) is the politicians. Remember what Plato said 2,500 years ago:-
    "He who most wishes to rule is he least fitted to do so."
     
    • Like Like x 3
  8. yip, give it a rest, other threads are available
    so,it was 350 less the rebate less the investment in areas the uk gov wont?
     
    • Face Palm Face Palm x 1
  9. Rhino why come into a brexit thread then complain we are talking about brexit?

    Fin, you lose on indi 1, you moan, you huff and puff on indi 2 and when your own leader hides it in the cupboard you moan, and when you lose brexit you moan

    Have you ever thought about being a sex line operator with all that moaning? You'd make at least 2 groates an hour, maybe more
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. so it was 350 less rebate less any investment the uk gov wont?
     
  11. It's all a bit like buying laptops isn't it Finm :eek:
     
  12. no, its nothing like buying a lap top exe.
     
    • Drama Queen Drama Queen x 2
  13. It's more like buying a laptop than what you're on aboot brw :)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. deffo, just clarifying another one of your...eh...facts. brw, if its tech advise im after i will ask the designer not the abuser.
    here exe, weesht stick to what you know. have a look at these pair o boobies
    upload_2017-12-18_19-40-56.jpeg
     
  15. Are they your staff? If not I don't know who they are :thinkingface:
     
  16. The Remainers were told that a vote to leave would have immediate and dire economic consequences. Was that a lie also ?
     
    #10858 johnv, Dec 18, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. It was £350million gross, but the rest came back with strings attached, in other words, we were told how it was to be spent.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  18. pathetic, i will up your complaint on a single tweet from a single complaint with raft of bbc presentations on just one issue alone.
    Below is a complaint lodged with the BBC. The complaint relates to coverage on BBC Scotland of an accusation levelled against the Scottish Government by the Scottish Tory party and the subsequent failure of BBC Scotland to provide similar coverage when the accusation was shown to be false.

    On Nov 27th, the National Audit Office issued a press release in which it admitted making a mistake in a report it had released to the media thirteen days earlier. The NAO admitted that figures for basic rate income tax payers in Scotland had been overestimated in the report and that this was the reason the report had been pulled on 14th November.

    This admission exposed as false, claims made by the Scottish Tory party on 14th November. Ruth Davidson’s party had claimed the NAO had withdrawn the report due to “bullying” by the Scottish Govt. The claim was reported by BBC Scotland in several radio bulletins that same day and also in a lengthy item on the evening edition of Reporting Scotland.

    Viewers to Reporting Scotland heard the Scottish Govt being accused of “bullying the NAO to try to coverup the truth”. In all of the news reports the Scottish Govt was heard on the defensive. The accusation and its denial were both presented as equally possible, despite the fact there was literally no evidence to back up the ‘bullying’ claim.

    Given the bullying claim was considered important enough to be covered on Reporting Scotland then it is odd that the admission from the NAO, which proved the accusation was false, was not covered at all. The press release from the NAO was arguably a *bigger* story given it both highlighted an error from a respected organisation *and* provided evidence that accusations by the Scottish Tory party had been fabricated.

    Reporting Scotland had an obligation to report this development. Yet it did not do so. Those viewers to the November 14th edition who may have believed Tory accusations true, were thus denied an opportunity to have their opinion revised. The result is that a baseless accusation has received widespread coverage, whilst the truth has been all but ignored. The only reference to the NAO admission appeared on Radio Scotland at 19:30 on Nov 28th.
    logical my ass.
     
    • Drama Queen Drama Queen x 2
Do Not Sell My Personal Information