British Indy: What Happens Now?

Discussion in 'Wasteland' started by Loz, May 23, 2015.

?
  1. Full Brexit with "no EU deal" on the 29th March.

  2. Request Extension to article 50 to allow a general election and new negotiations.

  3. Request Extension to article 50 to allow cross party talks and a new deal to be put to EU.

  4. Request Extension to article 50 to allow a second referendum on 1. Remain in EU or 2. Full Brexit.

  5. Table a motion in parliament to Remain in EU WITHOUT a referendum.

  6. I don't know or I don't care anymore

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Unlikely look what happens when people are given a real choice

    The referendum in Scotlands result is ignored by their government
    The referendum in the U.K. has been blocked in the U.K. for three years
    Macron admitted if the French had a referendum then there would have been a frexit so they don't have one
    two in holland
    one and then ignored to be replaced anyway in ireland by the lisbon agreement.

    Governments of ALL parties just give enough to make it look like democracy
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. And Catalonia - that seems to have died down, oh, hang on - thought that was Hong Kong in the news earlier :eek: nope, just the good old EU :thinkingface:
     
    #40882 Exige, Oct 19, 2019
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 19, 2019
    • Useful Useful x 1
  3. Catalonia, unless there is a bit of back room diplomacy going on that we don't know about, that is a genuine failure of the EU.
     
  4. if you accept noobs version of events as facts there, then there is no peaceful solution for you.
     
  5. Just make the referendum legally binding.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. This is just a rough lay out of time periods for another referendum based on the first, just structurally. It can vary but not by too much. Some will try and say it could be done quicker but then you have the obvious question why was it not done so before https://constitution-unit.com/2018/...t-take-to-hold-a-second-referendum-on-brexit/

    It would inevitably face legal challenges because it would seek to overturn 17.4 million peoples vote for no legitimate reason than the losing side didn't like the result

    Remainers would also need to push through legislation if they wanted 16-18 year olds which would add time

    politically, no party would want to admit to being the party that just told 17.4 million voters to "fuck off your votes don't count", just before a general election
     
    • Face Palm Face Palm x 1
  7. and politically a party would benefit by telling the 52% they where shafted by the others. I could imagine they would be quite aggressive about it too.
     
  8. The LIBs are full on with being the party of the people who reject the referendum - apparently most UK voters do not want to leave the EU.
     
  9. Of course they do Malcom :joy:
     
  10. Well done Boris.... get it done.
    Two letters, an email and loads of telephone calls.
    THE Bitches will be back in court on a Monday.... I wonder which court they'll pick?
     
  11. I'm not sure they will be in court if what was required has been done? I believe a letter was sent on behalf of the government but not officially signed by Johnson in regards to an extension request
     
  12. The SNP have already said they will take it back to court.


    SNP
    A bunch of bloody-minded charlatans intent upon destroying the union of the United Kingdom, supported by a bunch of anti-English bigots.

    The entire basis of their arguement centres around a non-renewable source of energy that they claim ownership to but seem to forget that without the help of the UK as a whole would not have had the means to extract it in the first place. Not to mention their shyness when it comes to addressing the West Lothian question.

    Their entire mission statement is fantastical and unsustainable. Should Scotland become a divided nation current schemes such as free university tuition fees and the shambles that is the Scottish parliament would crumble leaving already poor Scottish citizens to foot the bill.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Crap Crap x 1
  13. nice. your words? could that be the aggression I was talking about?. no point mentioning the oil anyway, we all know it run out years ago. and besides, if you look at all the silly wee successful countries of the world. very few have oil..
     
  14. Yours is all used frying mars bars :D
     
  15. if yer wanting on the stage I think the playhouse is looking for a cleaner.
     
  16. We have theatres down here fin, we iz cultured
     
  17. That would be an example of English Exceptionalism which has been talked about quite a bit in the media recently but most people here do not recognise
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. 3 letters sent.

    1st required by law, but unsigned.
    [​IMG]

    2nd covering letter
    [​IMG]

    3rd from Bozza on behalf of HM Gov't
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  19. Thick as mince.

    he did a program recently on the NI issue and he asked people from NI to call up and explain to him what the big deal about the border issue and the GFA was because “as an Englishman he didn’t understand”. An hour later having taken many calls from people who spoke with clarity, he still didn’t get it
     
  20. if I were the EU I would take him not signing the first letter as meaning his negotiations of the past few weeks were wholly disingenuous and he wants a no deal Brexit.

    Macron is insisting on no extension so he may well get it
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information