1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

99 900 Monster Clutch Weirdness.

Discussion in 'Monster' started by =^..^=, Nov 24, 2022.

  1. There appears to be a full compliment of springs in that photo.
     
  2. :sob:
     
  3. What's the overall thickness of the 'pack'?

    I find that going slightly under the recommended (38.5mm IIRC?) helps with drag, especially if you have larger slave cylinder for reduced pull.

    On the other hand, as it wears it'll get better until, of course it gets too thin...
     
  4. he's done it now DD, agree with you on going slightly under 38.5.
     
  5. Original (with slippage) 37.33 mm
    Total replacement (unable to select neutral) 38.82mm
    "Hybrid" - some old, some new (no issues) 38.46 mm
    Gap between last plate and drum - 4.2mm
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. Look very closely at the bottom one and the top one.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Some years back, I was using the 'racing' clutch pack on my 916 - has thinner (and one extra) sintered friction plates and I removed 2 springs as an experiment in reducing clutch pull.

    It worked fine, no slippage and a clutch so light a small child could pull it.

    I've since swapped to alloy clutch basket & plates and have manned up enough to refit all 6 springs but, with selective use of 1.5mm plain plates (standard are 2mm) plus, fitting just the one plain plate in the bottom of the pack can still squeeze an extra friction plate in there.
     
Do Not Sell My Personal Information