Switzerland has signed up to freedom of movement as has Norway. Farage gave both countries as examples of what the U.K. could be like whilst at the same time saying we needed to control our borders
This is the thing with most of fins stuff, it constantly hides actual numbers in favour of exagerative and missleading percentages. Example, 33% of panasonic headquarters staff are moving to Amsterdam sounds dramatic till you find out there was only 10 staff here and 3 are going to Amsterdam. You'll find many of these nuances in reports such as the one offered by fin.
Yes, you were saying, because of their leave due to the referendum policy. Labour said the same. Lib Dem’s said they would remain. So, if people had decided they’d rather the U.K. remained in the EU, why didn’t the Lib Dem’s win ?
It's been a while since I took Geography at school. Is Norway another name for Switzerland? If it is, I assume you conceded my point. If not, I will assume you dodged it. Wait. "Fax"? What is wrong with you? Are you old?
It was a saying from a long time ago. I am not too well versed on the differences between the relationship that Norway and Switzerland have with the EU. I just know that they both are signed up to freedom of movement. The Swiss are talking about having a referendum to abandon that though And yes, I am old
Good point, but if they were that concerned that staying in the EU was the most important thing for the U.K. they would have voted Lib Dem surely (Like the 6million or so that have signed the revoke article 50 petition or the 0.6 million that marched Saturday for a people’s vote)
So ... just a stroll through Logic Park, if you don't mind. Shouldn't take much of your time. Scenario 1: One of the defining characteristics of the EU is open trade borders within the EU. Another one would be, freedom of movement. Core values. Scenario 2: Trade agreements determine the terms of trade - surprisingly enough. For instance, Tariffs, customs arrangements and such. Trade shit. Which of the above scenarios most exactly matches the extent of the nature of the relationship between Switzerland and the EU (and Norway and the EU)? : o / I do hope that nothing in Logic Park frightened you. It can be an unsettling place for newcomers.
Oooo a logic question, I like those, see if anyone can guess the answer to these two claims (1) Any brexit restriction on migrants will leave Scotchland struggling to bring in the migrant workforce Scottish business needs (2) Any brexit restriction on migrants will see 100,000 Scotchland people unemployed What do you think the answer is?
I amnt here to describe other countries relationships with the EU. It’s a fact that neither are full members of the EU and it’s a fact both have close relationships with the EU. Should you wish to characterise them as being members then fill your boots, but legally they are not
The answer is, if you can’t get staff your business folds. 100,000 people working in businesses which are understaffed, customer service suffers or can’t generate enough turnover to cover the overheads both result in business closure through either customers going elsewhere or lack of profit. Anything else?
Then you have read the emotive and not the actual. The need for additional migrant staff was for the expansion of Scottish industry and NOT the maintenance of, your welcome
Nope, you were trying to look smart but it backfired. Next time, read the article, you're still welcome
