I did once hear that a better insult would be to suggest said person had come second in a 'biggest cunt' competition - being such a cunt they couldn't even win a 'biggest cunt' competition
Fiiiiiiiiiigggggghhhhhhhhhhtttttttttttttt https://www.standard.co.uk/news/cri...ested-charged-assaulting-police-a4304306.html Ms Abbotts Son denies the charges saying, there was at least a hundred and seventy twelve of them.
who cares about generics? The issue is the drugs under patent which if they go up in price means either increased drugs bill or people moved off of 21st drugs and onto drugs from the 1980s with similar outcomes never voted labour in my life
On the 4th day of Christmas the Steptoe loony gave away: Chequers to the homeless - now if he had said the house of lords then hey oh lets go!
As suspected, The answer to will you get £6700 in your pocket is......no https://www.theguardian.com/politic...ur-really-save-families-more-than-6700-a-year Just watched it be pulled apart on sky news, over £5000 of the 'savings' are proposed to come from childcare and seasonal rail tickets that only 5% of the population would even use enough rail travel to make that worthwhile. It's hardly the 'average family' Then the rest is made up of them pushing through full Privatisation of energy, water, broadband successfully and to their time line of 2030 if you believe this mob could do even a tenth of what they're proposing, for the money they're proposing it would cost, then you must be 110% Corbynista as only the true believers would swallow this
watching that video dooing the rounds of bojo ect taking the piss out of trump, there's somthing not quite right about it me thinks. i think bojo knows its being recorded.
You know I'm almost more disappointed in Labour than i am the Conservatives in terms of their campaigning. All Labour had to do to get ahead in this election (other than replace Corbyn as the obvious move) was to propose sensible and financially credible policies, just enough of them that make immediate sense and go from there. Get in to power first and then roll out the longer term strategy, not talk up promises that'll 'maybe' happen by 2030. Instead they keep wheeling out billions upon billions of pounds worth of promises, most of which are based on massively flawed math and not remotely in tune with the world of economics. Yes an earlier and more defined view on Brexit would have helped massively, but that ship sailed. And yet had they remained even something close to sensible i feel they'd be doing much much better, in fact given how bumbling boris is they could have been leading by now. Thats how shit a choice we have in todays politically world. Everyone knew what you'd get from the Tories & Borris, Brexit first and a few sweeteners to top it off. Plain as day and could have been written months ago. Labours tactic has been nothing short of knee jerk and thats what worries most people. On day one they launched an incredibly over the top manifesto, not all elements are a bad idea, but they crammed so much wishful thinking in it became implausible to implement according to plan. And from there on its as though they've watched the polls daily and when they've not gained they've reacted in despair by rushing out another multi billion offer, and another, and another. And today we're getting another offer by Miss 'Angry Pointy Finger' herself. https://www.theguardian.com/politic...-part-of-labour-plan-to-poverty-proof-schools This one again supported by the rise in corp tax, something that everyone within the world of economics and business is clearly stating will inevitably increase prices and/or reduce employment. So by that very logic, Labour are stoking their own fire and will be constantly locked in the need to raise more and more money to support everything they're promising as the lower paid will need more and more support as the top gets squeezed.
