imagine this. (what's the chances in me reading this after some of my posts today) spooky. https://grousebeater.wordpress.com/2020/01/11/england-admiring-fascism/
people with experience mostly. but tbh, posting links to the daily express and Hansard, while deliberating in between, isn't particularly hard
I suppose from the source that facism was not unique to small groups in the U.K. https://www.scotsman.com/arts-and-c...fortable-truths-in-fascist-scotland-1-2881250 https://www.heraldscotland.com/arts_ents/15339917.the-forgotten-story-of-scotlands-italian-fascists/
yip, they where not called tartan torys back in the day for nothing noob. we fucked them off 50 years ago (them being the britsh states depiction)
the links in the piece are to our papers and words spoken in parliament. indisputable. only the interpretation of those words are up for debate chiz.
indisputable to compare England to Nazi Germany? interpretation? you are a smart guy fin, no doubt, but … forget it.... as you were...
yer to quick to comment there chiz. as I have said before, yer man is right at the far end of what I read. but the parallels are there.
None of which makes the slightest difference to us leaving the eu fin. We voted as a country, not as individual nations, job jobbed. Trying to use a short burst of a minor group of fascists in a country of now 66 million seems a peculiar and rather wasteful use of words. Even more so given the block we are leaving, has more countries over a longer period of facism than the U.K. has ever had.
a country of fascists or led by them? governed by consent noobster. governed by consent. we have refused consent, at the ballot box and cross party at Holyrood. something's gonna give. I can feels it.
I think if brexit showed anything, those who now say governed by consent, didn't understand acting upon the result by consent. For some, consent simply seems to be "only when I win" Perhaps democracy is an anathema to them and might explain why they have a fascist background?
we haven't given consent to any part of the Brexit process. solutions where offered where the bigger country could not ride roughshod over the smaller populations but where ignored. compromises where offered after the vote so England could leave, unopposed. but they where ignored too. you're leaving us with no choice but to explore our options.
I promised myself I would comment no further on this lest I exposé my stupidity but what compromises were made so that England could leave unopposed? I must have missed those...
Yep, you'r trying to infect another thread with indi nonsense again fin The U.K. had a countrywide vote, there was never an individual nation vote. Thanks to a few parties in parliament, one was yours I believe, we were given a general election in which we now have a democratically elected country wide government which has a substantial majority. Apart from some losers who still struggle with the term democracy and majority votes, the benefit of the g.e. has seen a massive reduction in hatred from stirring politicians (except in one corner) and a massive reduction in msm stirring the pot hourly on brexit, this is to be welcomed. The eu now knows we have a very strong hand and no more of the internal sabotaging is possible, again a good thing. Most are moving forward
your not stupid chiz. most folks aren't. most folks the world over are good folks. only the info and the interest in finding it differ for one reason or another. before the vote it was suggested that a majority, if not all the countries that are part of the UK (by consent) would have to vote leave before the UK could leave. After the vote, our parliament and Gov produced a paper and presented it to the UK gov where it was argued we could stay in the customs Union and single market while you guys did your thing. it was handed back as unworkable but went on to morph into the N/I deal.
