Did you see these bits The Council should switch completely to qualified majority voting, wherever this is possible under the treaties, to avoid blocking important draft laws and speed up the legislative process, and A permanent Council of Defence Ministers should be set up to coordinate the member states’ defence policies
On QT last week,smirking Dodgy Dumblebore pressed JRM last week for examples of the Beebs favourite phrase,"Despite Brexit". Here's just a few: https://order-order.com/2017/11/02/bbc-home-of-despitebrexit/
How many encouraging developments "despite Brexit" will there be before people start saying "because of Brexit"?
Nothing will ever be enough, because no matter what 'they' will always point towards some negativity and align it with Brexit, no matter how tedious the link. Project fear is still very much in full swing, they just keep turning it up a notch
Most likely I did, but you can be quite flexible with the choice of word. Crap, shit, piss poor, they all work
The reason why I mentioned those two is that they are 1 seeking to make a ministry of defence of europe where the countries of the eu's military would now be under eu control but the second is a sign they are worried. The eu has always been all members agree or nothing happens, this tradttionally has allowed the smaller countries/partitions can have an equal amount of power as the largest. Recent events in regards to the Belgium region of Walloon was able to hold the whole of the eu to ransom over the eu Canada deal. You also have recent election changes of less obsessed eu countries such as Austria and the Czech republic and the rising influence of the Visegard group within the eu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visegrád_Group By making this move away from all for one and one for all they are removing the equality powers of the smaller countries who have fewer seats, in exchange for just having to reach a majority which can be easily achieved when you see how the seats are allocated http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/...share-out-of-meps-seats-among-28-eu-countries Lastly, A tipping point of convenient timing. When the U.K. leaves the eu it will leave behind 73 seats. The eu could due to it's ever increasing costs, simply do away with those 73 seats and save a fortune for europes taxpayers https://www.theguardian.com/politic...-european-parliament-seats-eu-wide-candidates
project fear? whats this project fear campaign yer constantly blabbering about? is it a new thing? BBC propaganda? over something as trivial as brexit?, you guys are losing it. next you will be saying each and every publication is lying to you too. well, the ones you disagree with. nut jobs.
Finm, Here is a picture of 3 of the ringleaders. They have now rebranded themselves as the arch-remainers. Blair prefers the one-to-one meets with his best buddy Juncker. We would be in a much better position if they all slinked off and left the stage!
Fin bless you, Honestly I thought the loz mentoring programme was working Oo that reminds me, the saviour of information because all of the media is against him, you must be happy that the charges against the Rev are not being taken any further
How could such pathetic low-achieving has-beens possibly inspire fear with their fantacising? They should be countered with project-contempt, project-derision and project-determination. As for the BBC, at least I don't pay the license fee. Its a small start but when I see their childishly transparent propaganda its nice to know I'm not paying for it.
I'd be interested to know who is paying their expenses on things such as travel, hotel rooms, cars, staff
the tweets noob are still in the public domain, they where never taken down and where never taken seriously. the charges where brought by yer mentor mcfadyen of the express. most retractions in the press, up here anyhoo are as a result of wings debunking. the fact of the matter is you have been suckered into contesting something i entirely agree with. you dumb ass, always in too much of a hurry to disagree. i dont trust the BBC on anything with a political content and less and less re Scottish history, they should stick to making nature programs. btf, i think the national coverage of my party is why better than the pitiful SBBC. wonder how yer beloved Scotsman will transform if the dutch take over bid with yer Salmond at the helm goes through?.
Fin there has been no suckering, your trying to drag people into "see I got you" is so obvious you may as well sent a telegraph. Sometimes we will agree, on those times you see sense C- for effort and execuion I still am not a journalist, I am still not siobahn mcfadden nor do I work for the express despite you keep saying it hoping some mud will stick. As to the rev I did find it funny they did NOT say there is no case to answer but only they would not be taking the case further. Alex is an irrelevance now as is the snp and indi vote, I appreciate you wondering around in circles like a cult victim saying indi indi indi as your prayers go unanswered because your leader sold you out but honestly. That's a matter you should take up at the next scottish ukip concert
Okay, I’ll Put it in the cupboard that Nicola put indi 2 in. Then neither will be seen again. Good idea fin, ta.
things is, if salmond is an irrelevance, despite being in a more powerful position now he doesent have the constraints of office, why are you lot getting all het up over some has beens going on a fact finding mission? why is it even necessary? why wont yer gov release the relevant info? it cant be because its a negotiation stance because the EU can do impact studies to.
