https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/ukne...eveals/ar-BBF42tD?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=mailsignout This is excellent news. It means the EU, having decided in advance what our traded deal will be, has effectively abandoned "negotiations". This means there is no point continuing with this farce, nor any point in paying them a single penny. We should leave immediately, pay nothing and revert to WTO rules and stop wasting everyone's time and taxpayer's money.
Some people could be accused of being born with a silver spoon in their mouth, you duke, more likely a lemon such is your bitterness. As to the eu's plans, like most plans/future implementations, often they pre-leak to see what the feedback is on an option. If correct then yeah, in continues to re-enforce wto is a far better option than the eu still retaining control through the back door. It is funny watching so many business people still trying to override democracy though. As to the German government creation http://www.dw.com/en/germanys-jamai...-merkel-confident-amid-differences/a-41414474
Couple of Europhiles being interviewed by Euro-fanatic and well-fed leftie Adam Bolton on Sky news this morning. Yasmin Alibhai-Brown (whoever she is - Guardianista of some sort I think) waffling on claiming that various parts of the UK are having second thoughts about Brexit. Without offering any evidence, Wales, she claimed, to give one example, was "getting jittery" because "they get all this money from Europe and we just won't have it when we leave". You silly, silly woman: IT WAS OUR MONEY TO START WITH!!! How many more times: for every £1 we get back from the EU, the UK has had to pay out £2 up front. We will have the money, we'll have more of it to spend on our own country than we have now and we'll be free to choose how we spend it. What is so difficult to understand about this?
And now he's got some other demented Europhiliac claiming the only way to preserve an open Northern Irish border is for the UK to stay in the customs union - or stay in the EU as its known in English. Errr, no luv. There is another way - apart from applying a bit of grown-up common sense but there isn't time to explain that concept to you now - and that is for the Republic of Ireland to leave the EU as well.
Ireland is not in Schengen. It the EU want border control between, let them have and pay for it. See how that will benefit Ireland where the largest trade partners are the US and UK.
It is in fact the eu's rules and not the U.K.'s wishes that they have a hard border at those entrances into the eu If you are a citizen of a country outside the EU, you will need to prove your identity and present official papers to border guards/authorities when you enter the EU for the first time. You can only cross the EU's external borders at designated border crossing-points and during formal opening times. http://ec.europa.eu/immigration/what-should-i-avoid/how-to-enter-the-eu/crossing-the-eu-borders_en
Sorry if its already been on here but James Dyson seems to speak some sense. I saw this on the Andrew Marr show last week. https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1448058345292402
Dyson, the man so concerned about the UK and its people that he sets up his companies offshore to avoid paying UK tax and moves his manufacturing to Malaysia to avoid paying British workers. Bloke is a two faced bell end.
A predictable reaction by any remain voter Although sadly strangely understandable, that is if we're now at a point where by any company that uses perfectly legal means in regards to its tax liability, or indeed it's worldwide manufacturing setup, is on the hit list of the 'outraged', which seems to be the flavour of the month. Better throw those iPhones away boys and girls. I presume that also means the correct way of thinking is that the majority of companies should only manufacture in the country where they were born? Even though that's at odds with Anti-nationalism finger waving that remain voters also seem to be doing, you just can't win can you. It is somewhat hypocritical really given that many of the products and parts most of us use are manufactured in a wide range of countries, even those on certain Ducati motorcycles. Having said that I wonder whether Ducati pays all its tax in Italy? Perhaps time we gave up on those too? Even still, whether you like Dyson or not, you'd be a fool to think that he is (a fool) For such a company that relies heavily on its brand, and one thats got the owners face at the very forefront of its marketing, he's not the sort of man who would risk his company on a whim or for shits and giggles. Why on earth would he say something purposefully to harm himself, the UK and his company, if indeed he didn't actually believe in what he has say? I suppose it's some sadistic scorched earth policy is it? Interesting concept
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/tech...o-open-a-second-rd-tech-campus-in-the-uk/amp/ And the "bell end" employs thousands in the UK and continues to invest in R&D. Welcome to Ducs world of well balanced opinion.
Here's the fragrant Yasmin for you. Some more of the tolerant yasmin https://order-order.com/2017/11/17/yasmin-alibhai-brown-id-rather-mugabe-may/
Article 50 requires no financial leaving fee. Article 50 is a legal document The eu has asked us to fulfill our legal obligations of which the U.K. has always said it will. The current legal obligations run out in 2020 The eu then replied no not just the legal ones but the moral ones too on events that will happen within the eu long after you leave The eu recently has declared that the legally agreed refund of £5 billion due to the U.K. is now at risk if the U.K. does not meet their demands for a moral payment after we leave It seems when it comes to the eu, legal agreements mean nothing to the eu and when legal agreements contradict what they want they try to use moral agreements that were never made. At least with wto, they cannot twist the rules
They appear to have a £60Bn hole, which rather oddly adds up to their pension commitments... One wonders why Clegg wants to stay in, just sayin.
