I’m not convinced by that. They’ve been on the fence about it the whole way regarding how the anti bodies drop off and from what I’ve seen and heard it seems to vary. That could very well be the papers doing what papers do. But a valid concern none the less
Thing is as well with the anti body thing. Is with all these relentless lockdowns all we have done really is delay the inevitable in my mind. so if the anti bodies do only last for so long... by slowing it down.. could we even argue we have made this worse (all things considered) If we’d let it do it’s thing, it would have blitzed through and potentially fucked off by now. To become a seasonal type situation as per influenza maybe. Who knows. just food for thought
What it doesn’t mention is how that relates to a vaccine. If my understanding is correct, wouldn’t this mean a vaccine would quickly ‘wear off’ or am I missing something.
From what I understand with vaccines I would suggest it’s a very good point mate. Maybe they’d look at boosters or something. The dangerous thing is, I don’t actually think they know or can atleast agree on its behaviour
So many questions for you too discover & form a lead helmet to protect your acute sense of mindfulness.
Perhaps... Though the testing shows how many people have antibody traces which enables the estimates on how many people have previously had the virus, which in turn allows us to know whether the disease has been truly widespread. As yet this would not be the case. Therefore if the disease was not widespread in spring/ summer and it killed between 40K and 60K, its fairly straight forward to work out what is a likely fatality rate based on differing levels of contagion.
I have a suspsion death rates will be way over the sub 1% banded about, these figures maybe nearer the truth, time will tell. Mortality Analyses - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality
The mortality figures for direct covid deaths here in the UK are nowhere near what they are proposed to be, it hardly takes much intelligence to work that out either given the very publicised loose way those deaths end up in the 'died WITH covid' stats. That isn't denying covid, it's just common sense and a matter of fact. In fact some of the scientists putting out such figures should be ashamed of themselves for having their name alongside certain analysis published, it shows a willful ignorance to the errors being made and how poor the data they're using really is...it shows a huge lack of professionalism in my view Perspective is sorely missing right now
I simply don't believe the data being fed us. I've spoken to far too many people professionally associated with the Covid-19 circus. My wife included. Almost everyone concludes massive bullshittery going on with data. And my question is- Why?
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...guresondeathsregisteredbyareaofusualresidence Looking at some of the spreadsheets available here, the total deaths for a year doesn't look like being significantly higher this year ? What am I missing ?
It's not that they know less, but like you've said - they've spent their whole life studying. Doesn't there need to be some common sense / real world applied too. Bit like hurting your ankle and being told to rest it with your leg raised for 2 weeks, how many actually do that, it's not practical if you are self employed for example.
Common Sense? Did someone mention Common Sense? Sadly I have to report that Common Sense has died. Common Sense has been the biggest casualty of Covid-19. However this has been mistakenly reported as the true reason for it’s passing is social media. Common Sense is survived by Mass Hysteria.
