1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

899 V 1199

Discussion in 'Panigale' started by jimmy 43, Dec 13, 2014.

Page 7 of 11
  1. i got £2k off my 848 in 2010 and got above £3k off the 1199. No px on either as they were sold to traders.
     
    #121 d8mok, Jan 5, 2015
  2. Thats prob about right the 140 quoted is crank power the 142 on dyno is rwhp
     
    #122 smorgan46, Jan 5, 2015
  3. It all depends where the torque is, not the max value. The 899, from the seat of my pants, doesn't make the torque that the 999 does at 4'000 - 6'000. And that is a handy place to have it when negotiating nadgery roads with lots of blind bends.

    Exactly. A 900cc twin after a 600cc four is going to feel like a torque-meister.
     
    #123 gliddofglood, Jan 5, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Ex demos probably or pre registered
     
    #124 smorgan46, Jan 5, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  5. well it cant be right as a crank horse power will be greater that whats at the wheel due to all the loss of power through the gear box final drive etc etc

    the numbers quoted by manufacturers will always be pie in the sky and bear no resemblance to reality...
     
    #125 andyb, Jan 5, 2015
  6. Andy he is quoting something from my post. I had quoted 140 as the official hp and couldnt understand why I only got 142 on the dyno after having a full system fitted.
     
    #126 Cupid Stunt, Jan 5, 2015
  7. So your increase if it was compared that way would of been bigger than you first thought....
     
    #127 andyb, Jan 5, 2015
  8. In all honesty mate I don't know if they were quoting RWHP or Fly wheel, I don't care anymore bike went over a year ago.
     
    #128 Cupid Stunt, Jan 5, 2015
  9. the thing is a dyno operator can offer up a bit of a calculation off the top of his head call in a correction factor and come up with a bigger number calling it crank hp rather than at the wheel hp.........

    you could of course just be sent a supposed print out.............:rolleyes::upyeah:;)
     
    #129 andyb, Jan 5, 2015
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  10. Yeah I suppose but because it is mechanical I would have thought the equation to work out RW back to crank & vice versa should be pretty spot on.
     
    #130 Cupid Stunt, Jan 5, 2015
  11. i only need a 899, but i want a 1199!
     
    #131 micky1, Jan 5, 2015
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. You have whatever you want mate & if your missus asks, tell her I said it's ok
     
    #132 Cupid Stunt, Jan 5, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  13. No point buying and regretting it.
     
    #133 d8mok, Jan 5, 2015
  14. pre reg is still new never been used , doesn't bother me if it says 1 previous owner, and makes no difference when u p/x whatsoever ,, the salesman opens his book and gives you bottom,
     
    #134 jimmy 43, Jan 5, 2015
  15. last sports bike i had was a gixer 600.

    i prefer the torque of a v twin. must get to have go on a pani
     
    #135 micky1, Jan 5, 2015
  16. Exactly most and nearly all bike rolling road figures are rear wheel power and the figures released by the manufacturer are crank power so his 848 at 140hp crank would be around126 rwhp so he got 16hp from system and remapwhich is a pretty healthy gain !
     
    #136 smorgan46, Jan 5, 2015
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  17. of course it makes a difference to overall price wether its new and pre registered so say its a 14 platewith no moles its still older than a 15 plate brand new one side by side the 15 plate is gonna be worth more
     
    #137 smorgan46, Jan 5, 2015
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. Do moles ride bikes?
     
    #138 Cupid Stunt, Jan 5, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  19. Miles not moles stupid phone
     
    #139 smorgan46, Jan 5, 2015
  20. I couldnt edit it stupid phone and fat thumbs lol
     
    #140 smorgan46, Jan 5, 2015
    • Funny Funny x 1
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 7 of 11
Do Not Sell My Personal Information